Home › Forums › Horse Racing › If we had to get rid of one racecourse.
- This topic has 37 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 10 months ago by
graysonscolumn.
- AuthorPosts
- July 18, 2011 at 21:41 #365132
If we HAD to get rid of a course. That’s, HAD to… then I’d nominate Brighton.
AN old tired crap hole of a track situated in an area marginally classier than a run-down public khazi, that offers the worst class of racing you could imagine on a rotten track. Diverse? I’d say you have to draw the line somewhere…
Only if we
had
to, though.
July 19, 2011 at 07:32 #365153Fair point Miss Woodford but as Scanman alluded to I was referring to your flat racing tracks – I should have been more specific.
July 20, 2011 at 11:18 #365258In my opinion the point is most people agree there needs to be a reduction in fixtures
Nope.
gc
Jeremy Grayson. Son of immigrant. Adoptive father of two. Metadata librarian. Freelance point-to-point / horse racing writer, analyst and commentator wonk. Loves music, buses, cats, the BBC Micro, ale. Advocate of CBT, PACE and therapeutic parenting. Aspergers.
July 20, 2011 at 11:19 #365259so a reduction in courses is a way of reducing fixtures
Nope #2.
Spot on Ginger, I think one or two of our more experienced contributors are confusing issues here.
Nope #3.

gc
Jeremy Grayson. Son of immigrant. Adoptive father of two. Metadata librarian. Freelance point-to-point / horse racing writer, analyst and commentator wonk. Loves music, buses, cats, the BBC Micro, ale. Advocate of CBT, PACE and therapeutic parenting. Aspergers.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.