Home › Forums › Big Races – Discussion › Oaks 2011
- This topic has 106 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by
darranm3.
- AuthorPosts
- May 25, 2011 at 07:21 #357097
I’ve already backed Havant earlier in the season, but cannot see past Havant and Wonder of Wonders coupled, can not have the favourite.
May 25, 2011 at 09:26 #357119Misty For Me should be aimed at the 1m2f races….races like the Nassau and Pretty Polly at the Curragh. They may go to France however and i think that be a wise move but she wont be beating the Fabre horse i would not have thought
May 25, 2011 at 13:33 #357163Dose that make a positive RubyIGITS?
May 25, 2011 at 13:37 #357164I dont follow Andy
May 25, 2011 at 16:33 #357184Only kidding Ruby. Famous double negatives.
May 26, 2011 at 12:24 #357330really like
class Q of course but think her attitude can see her placed at least and has a shrewd target trainer25/1
May 26, 2011 at 20:24 #357416
AnonymousInactive- Total Posts 17716
I’ve come to the conclusion that my Oaks winner is coming from David Wachmans yard in CRYSANTHEMUM – Following a succesion of analysis.
Basically I’ve used a process of elimination through strict standards, firstly I’ve narrowed the field down using the the average speed rating of all winning Oaks candidates leading up to their run which came out as (86), I’ve used the data to project a serious candidate award using the upper quartile of that data to (89)
I’ve then added all the winning Oaks horses speed ratings together to create an "experience" collum and using the lower quartile through the set of results I’ve come up with the figure of (174)
Oaks Candidates;
– Blue Bunting
– Togetther
– Laughing Lashes
– Siren’s SongSerious Candidates
– Crysanthemum
Each month also has a set of averages;
Apr – 0
May – 0
Jun – 78
Jul – 79
Aug – 85
Sep – 89
Oct – 87
Nov – 84
/
Mar –
Apri – 89
May – 90The two year old form probably doesn’t resemble much worth after the Oaks now although I would like to use it to see fillies that have used it to show genuine progressive traits i.e 79>88>94 etc although I’ll be more interest in those that have beaten the standards for April and May, they are;
– Blue Bunting
– Havant
– Misty For Me
– Zain Al Boldan
– Together
– Siren’s SongUsing a matrix to calculate how each Oaks winner performed in relation to the months standard I’ve averaged up their score then using the middle section between the lower and higher quartile range I believe the Oaks winner can be trapped between -2.2 and 1.0, that leaves us with
-10.8 Spin
-9.7 Beatrice Aurore
-8.7 Charleston Lady
-7.7 Zain Al Boldan
-7.7 Izzi Top
-6.7 Look At Me
-6.0 Khawlah
-4.3 Havant
-3.5 Bible Belt
-3.3 Dancing Rain
-1.8 Misty For Me
-1.5 Wonder of Wonders
-0.6 Blue Bunting
0.0 Chrysanthemum
3.0 Siren’s Song
3.8 Laughing Lashes
3.8 TogetherI think that brings in the right horses to be fare.
/
My final say on the matter is Wonder of Wonders and Blue Bunting are the likely stayers with Chrysantheum and Misty For Me probably the value bets although I’m siding with Wachman on this one
1st – Blue Bunting (2/1)
2nd – Chrysanthemum (25/1)
3rd – Misty For Me (7/1)
4th – Wonder of Wonders (4/1)I’ve attached the document I’ve been working ffrom if anyone finds it useful.
May 28, 2011 at 15:37 #357659Interesting race the fact that Moore has not been down for the ride on Havant even though it looks like he will ride. Would love him on Wonder of Wonders
May 28, 2011 at 15:37 #357660Mr Wilson ,if your selection wins I will go without solid food for a day. That is a promise I will keep.
May 28, 2011 at 17:56 #357686
AnonymousInactive- Total Posts 17716
Mr Wilson ,if your selection wins I will go without solid food for a day. That is a promise I will keep.
Funny as I don’t really expect it to win either
May 29, 2011 at 00:02 #357714I get the feeling that the Watchman horse is a typical Watchman horse that does not go on to progress as a 3yr old
May 29, 2011 at 03:16 #357718Interesting race the fact that Moore has not been down for the ride on Havant even though it looks like he will ride. Would love him on Wonder of Wonders

Seamus surely? Hope so.
May 29, 2011 at 06:32 #357725I am really stuck at the moment between Wonder of Wonders and Havant. Backed both at bigger prices (6s and 8s) and who I opt for a chunky size wager on the day will depend on the ground and who Ryan Moore is on of the two.
May 29, 2011 at 09:57 #357746Is there any reason why Havant should reverse form with Blue Bunting? On pedigree alone Wonder of Wonders is streaks ahead of Havant, whose sire has only produced 2 Group 1 winners at stud in a long, long career – Cavalryman and Cutlass Bay in 2 weak, weak French affairs, both for Andre Fabre.
She’s an early-May foal and May foals in total are 1-2-17 in the Oaks, Casual Look being the (somewhat fortuitous) winner. Stoute has had Dance A Dream finish 2nd and Petrushka finish 4th, both of whom had almost identical foaling dates to Havant.
All in all, I have no idea what she’s doing around the 11/2 mark, other than being Pricewise.
May 30, 2011 at 14:03 #357948Racing Post site seems to suggest Fallon is going to ride Wonder Of Wonders. Very hard to see why people are celebrating this news given how many times he messes up and how many big race winners he actually rides these days. Makes you wonder why Coolmore put Moore up in the first place if he was always going to ride the Stoute runner. It appears pretty pointless deserting their own jockeys if there is going to be a question mark about his availability on the big day.
May 30, 2011 at 16:24 #357963I didn’t understand that either.
Fallon’s worth a few lbs at Epsom, delighted to have him on-board.
May 30, 2011 at 19:41 #357992Wonder of Wonders impressed by the way she quickened and stayed at Chester.
To me, she looks a class act and I think she will take all the beating.
Gambling Only Pays When You're Winning
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.