Home › Forums › Archive Topics › Systems › each way bets
- This topic has 5 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 21 years, 2 months ago by
padman.
- AuthorPosts
- February 22, 2005 at 15:05 #1627
Cus I have been so good in my other thread of getting horses to come 2nd when I want them to come 1st. I thought I would do a each way test.
3.40 blue hills unplaced<br>4.40 keresforth unplaced<br>1pt each way 50pt bank to waste. 25pts on the win part and 25pts on the place part.
Paul<br>RT win =23<br>RT Place =23<br>Great start
(Edited by padman at 3:14 pm on Feb. 22, 2005)<br>
(Edited by padman at 4:57 pm on Feb. 22, 2005)
February 22, 2005 at 19:10 #58554I’ve always thought that if you could nominate to get paid on the second, rather than the winner, then…….of course, you would back more winners. I’ve certainly had more seconds than winners recently.
February 22, 2005 at 23:50 #58557I’ve always subscribed to the view that in betting (as well as in many other aspects of competitive life – sport etc) one would do well to do what your competitor does not want you to do. Our competitor is the bookmaker (in this instance) and the bookmaker makes his smallest return on straight forward win singles. Doubles, trebles, yankees & the like provide them with a better return.
Using the old ‘What’s bad for my enemy is good for me’ theory then win singles would seem the way to go, BUT:
I cant help feeling that suitable selections, backed sparingly in suitable races only, could bring home the bacon – am i being just a hopeless optimist? – probably, – nevertheless I wish you well with this padman. :cool:
A one time colleague assured me that he once knew someone who HE considered to make his living from betting (precious few of those about I would think), who commonly backed each way even on quite short favs, though I must add immediately that this is one of those ‘friend of a friend’ anecdotes where the facts remain just tantalisingly out of reach :biggrin:
February 23, 2005 at 10:09 #58560Thanks for the comments-lets hope the magic pin does the trick.;)
4.45 alessano L<br>5.15 farthing L
Paul<br>RT win =21<br>RT Place =21
<br>
(Edited by padman at 5:24 pm on Feb. 23, 2005)
February 24, 2005 at 10:12 #58562Todays. Think I am on to a loser with this BUT. I had 7 selects today but these are the only ones fc 2/1+
2.20 schuh shine<br>3.55 beauchamp prince<br>4.20 molina
2/1+ price filter from now on.
Cheers<br>Paul
February 24, 2005 at 21:35 #58564One loser and one 9/2 placed nag…………..IN THE FRIGGIN BIN WITH THIS. I just have no confidence at the mo in any of my picks.
Just feel real bad about posting.
A BIG SORRY.
Paul
My other 5% thread will turn around, thats a promse:biggrin:
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.