Home › Forums › Horse Racing › Blackcurrent in the 20:30 at Newcastle
- This topic has 5 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 2 years, 6 months ago by
sporting sam.
- AuthorPosts
- October 17, 2023 at 20:29 #1667031
The Alan Brown stable had three horses entered at Newcastle for tonight’s meeting.
The first two won at SPs of 5/1 and 12/1, though the latter was available at least at 22s.The third leg of the treble, Blackcurrent has become a non-runner at an estimated SP of around 3/1 maybe 5/2.
I guess it’s safe to take the cash for first two winners and get some further payout with the NR.
All of a sudden the Geoffrey Harker trained Sidney Bay is a 9/4 chance. I don’t know why, but the entire thing looks a bit strange. Well, maybe Blackcurrent slipped up in his box. You never know….October 17, 2023 at 20:41 #1667032And Sidney Bay wins at 3/1……..
October 17, 2023 at 21:21 #1667034curiouser and curiouser said Alice!
I've stumbled on the side of twelve misty mountains
I've walked and I crawled on six crooked highwaysOctober 18, 2023 at 07:12 #1667052When a horse is taken out of a race it has a dramatic effect on the outcome of the race. Every single horse in a race generates a tremendous amount of energy and all are allotted weight commensurate to their known ability. Different horses generate differing amounts of energy commensurate again to their ability and to the weight they carry. They are all placed into stalls in a straight line and often race around a turning track. In all cases they have a trajectory. There is an element of ballistics here as they are obliged to be “ propelled “ from their stalls. Take one of these horses out of those stalls and the trajectory will be affected. The energy that the horse would have put into the race has to go somewhere. Likening horses to projectiles placed in a chamber and propelled gives a visceral connotation to the surreal depiction of the event and helps to heighten the emotional disconnect one needs to coldly calculate the outcome of a race.
Because I know and understand a particular horse’s position in a race I can therefore calculate the effect via either the weights or the draw or both.
I’ve been talking about this for some time now and some of you have even questioned my sanity. I questioned it myself too in much the same way that others much more knowledgeable and verse in aspects of science and the arts have done before me. Our sanity is always questioned because we look at things from a totally different perspective.
I’m perfectly sane and have delved into it further and checked backed through years of results.
I have finally come up with the reasons and have a better understanding of what is actually happening.
I’ve long maintained that this is the case and put it down to the physics around us. The proof of course as with anything is “in the pudding “. Know one will believe until there is compelling results presented pre race. I’m there or thereabouts.
I’ve come up with a perfectly logical solution and am actually starting to profit from the results.
The clincher for me is applying the same logic to races taking place around the world the results are the same.
I watch several trainers in particular in Ireland and the uk because they seem to have also grasped an understanding of the physics behind a race.
I played in the blackcurrant race last night and was looking for the winner based directly on the absence of blackcurrant. The system I have developed is called Alexander there are several elements to the system that I employ free energy along with some of the laws of physics that I have stumbled on over the last year in action last night was traverse law. Thanks to the draw and the weights I was able to identify two of the first three home. The application of another aspect of Alexander would have given both the first and the fourth horse as they were the new top weights.
To be honest last night I was not trying to land a tricast last night and was set on identifying the winner. The finish of the race was dramatic and the newcomer had of course been laid out to win on yard debut. All three horses were involved in the finish.
Earlier on the card I identified several other runners through using the Alexander system. The system is named after the grandson of one of our own forumites. Big G.Cori G was a runner available at all prices earlier and heavily backed into 28/1 just failing.
Eyes the 15/2 winner was also identified.
There is one huge part of the principles of Alexander which probably best brings the many aspects of physics all together. The inventor and physicist Nikola Tesla’s principle of 369 underpins everything I have unearthed surrounding what is actually happening under race conditions.
I’m satisfied and very comfortable with what I’ve found out and the conclusions that I’ve reached. I’m no longer bothered about scepticism and ridicule I’ve nothing to prove to anyone except myself.
I’m visiting someone today who has suggested he may be actually willing to financially underpin my “crazy” ideas. And I’m taking it from there.October 18, 2023 at 15:57 #1667076You’ll get no ridicule from me SS: I’ve no idea what you’re on about but ‘off the wall’ ‘out of the box’ thinking is always to be commended
As ever, the bottom line will be judge and jury of your methods
You mention ballistics and physics. On races run round curves I’ve long thought that the extra energy required and increased strain put on the muscles, tendons and skeleton of horses in overcoming the effects of angular velocity/momentum/acceleration and centripetal/centrifugal forces are under-considered factors i.e. the effort required to maintain a racing line that follows the curve. Have I researched this? No
Tesla was a genuine genius but something of an oddball (those attributes tend to walk hand-in-hand) and my limited knowledge of his 369 theory leads me to believe that the general consensus is that it’s ‘pseudoscience’
The prime factors of 3, 6 & 9 are 3, 2*3 & 3*3 or 3^2. As every even number is divisible by 2 and every third number divisible by 3 you are going to get an awful lot of on-the-face-of-it interesting/remarkable/mysterious but actually obvious results by using 3, 6 & 9 as divisors of other numbers
However, just my opinion: if it works for you then go go go
October 18, 2023 at 22:39 #1667117Thank you Drone.
Good rational reading and actually echoes what I’ve found and while I won’t necessarily expand, I really hope to give a few examples in the coming days.
Using the physics as I see it,I posted the following earlier“kempton 2000
the draw data and all the indicators point very strongly to
Sonnerie power
win
french invasion
each way
is unbeaten here and launched career with spectacular demolition job here and hasn’t been in a lower class race since. Do also has good claims but big preference is for the Roger Varian runner”
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.