Home › Forums › Horse Racing › Beverley Draw
- This topic has 36 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 11 months ago by
davidjohnson.
- AuthorPosts
- April 14, 2009 at 23:24 #10951
Anyone heard/read anything about whether Beverley will be attempting to neutralize the effect of the draw again this season?
April 14, 2009 at 23:34 #221866Help yourself, Glenn…
gc
Jeremy Grayson. Son of immigrant. Adoptive father of two. Metadata librarian. Freelance point-to-point / horse racing writer, analyst and commentator wonk. Loves music, buses, cats, the BBC Micro, ale. Advocate of CBT, PACE and therapeutic parenting. Aspergers.
April 15, 2009 at 02:33 #221896Anyone heard/read anything about whether Beverley will be attempting to neutralize the effect of the draw again this season?
Yes they are.
Beverley are going to run over a new sprint trip of 1f.
April 15, 2009 at 03:45 #221904I notice the going is good to firm, watering to maintain. That’s about as close to an admission as you’re going to get I suppose.
April 23, 2009 at 16:53 #223200Don’t want to speak too soon, but you can invariably tell from the early betting when they’ve sabotaged the course. They didn’t at the last meeting and it doesn’t look like they have today.
May 27, 2009 at 00:34 #230363Anyone got any views on this for tomorrow night? It was business as usual in the 5f races on Saturday and they say they’re not watering so it should be OK, right?
May 27, 2009 at 01:47 #230380Hope so, mine’s coming from #1 in the Hilary…
May 27, 2009 at 04:23 #230393
AnonymousInactive- Total Posts 17716
I quite liked the look of Existentialist, Zarkava, but the draw hasn’t escpaed my notice. Then again, he who dares…
May 27, 2009 at 05:24 #2303983 of the last 5 winners came from between 1 + 3
May 27, 2009 at 14:17 #230437You’ve got to look at the most recent evidence Z- the old high draw bias was there in spades on Saturday, I couldn’t back anything drawn low today.
May 27, 2009 at 14:38 #230446You’ve got to look at the most recent evidence Z- the old high draw bias was there in spades on Saturday, I couldn’t back anything drawn low today.
I have to say I thought the rail itself was dead, and those who tried to take advantage of the draw by pressing on struggled to last home. Plenty of the horses involved in the finish came up the middle to far side off the rail itself, and I wouldn’t be surprised if the strip immediately next to the rail had been watered.
May 27, 2009 at 14:43 #230448Interesting observation Rory.
May 27, 2009 at 14:59 #230452I’m sure you’re all quite aware of this but anyway… the two 5f races tonight are Conditions events, both with approx 30lb RPR spread. So draw is unlikely to be so influential than in a handicap
May 27, 2009 at 22:40 #230555
AnonymousInactive- Total Posts 17716
Not a bias there, is there?
Three of the first four home in the Hilary Needler were drawn 11, 12 and 14, and four of the first five home in the mile handicap were drawn 10, 11, 14 and 16.
May 27, 2009 at 23:58 #230563I have to say I thought the rail itself was dead, and those who tried to take advantage of the draw by pressing on struggled to last home. Plenty of the horses involved in the finish came up the middle to far side off the rail itself, and I wouldn’t be surprised if the strip immediately next to the rail had been watered.
Excellent point by Mr Delargy there (and I’m not just saying that because we’re related) – and one backed up the victory of Wind Star.
May 28, 2009 at 00:20 #230566I’ve always rated that Andrew Mount as a judge.
May 28, 2009 at 10:22 #230624…………….hmmmm! kissin’ cousins?

Colin
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.