The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

Aeroplane’s overweight yesterday

Home Forums Horse Racing Aeroplane’s overweight yesterday

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #13765
    Glenn
    Participant
    • Total Posts 2003

    The shortest priced fav yesterday (or at least he was until the psychic layers pushed him out and the tramps clipped Tiddliwinks in) in the classiest race, broadcast on terrestrial TV, carried two pounds overweight.

    Some might consider this pertinent, as much for the fact that David Evans had chosen to put up a jockey that couldn’t do the correct weight for a horse set to carry nine stone as anything else. Just about the only such jockey at Lingfield yesterday!

    Was this communicated to stay at home punters? I could only find mention of it on racingpost’s live reporter feature. Maybe I missed it, but I didn’t hear anything on C4. The ATR website made no mention of it in it’s racecard (which usually include overweights) or subsequent results. When I checked last night the Press Association didn’t even have the overweight down in its results!

    Surely the time for info on overweights, jockey changes etc to be put on one definitive website is long overdue. Punters were quite literally robbed yesterday.

    #269121
    halfwaytoheaven
    Member
    • Total Posts 1387

    Didn’t hear anything about it and I’m a keen followed of Aeroplane.

    That aside, even within the weight limit Aeroplane wouldn’t have won yesterday. It sadly wasn’t his day

    #269122
    Glenn
    Participant
    • Total Posts 2003

    The overweight suggested it wasn’t going to be his day.

    #269124
    Avatar photoKen(West Derby)
    Member
    • Total Posts 1063

    To what extent or not does this overweight influence the Handicapper’s assessment of yesterday’s performance or will he not take that into consideration, please?
    K

    #269125
    halfwaytoheaven
    Member
    • Total Posts 1387

    The overweight suggested it wasn’t going to be his day.

    In hindsight maybe David Evans’ comments in the Post on Saturday stating that he was raring to go for Wolverhampton on Friday should’ve been taken into account?

    The race he was entered for on Friday was a 5f race.

    Not sure how the overweight suggested it wasn’t going to be his day though, Glenn? His form leading up to the race suggested he would be well up for the task but he ran nothing like his past form. I doubt 2lbs had anything to do with how poorly he ran.

    #269160
    Prufrock
    Participant
    • Total Posts 2081

    I remember having a letter published in The Sporting Life in 1985 asking that overweight be listed at declaration stage and that a horse be prevented from racing if a jockey could not be found to do the revised weight. Something like this existed in other countries then: I do not know if that is still the case.

    In Aeroplane’s case, this might have necessitated a declaration of 9-03 just to be safe. Exceptions could be made when circumstances conspired against connections (e.g. only fully fledged lightweight jockey at track ends up in hospital).

    Not much has changed in 25 years, other than that The Sporting Life has closed.

    #269171
    Black Sam Bellamy
    Participant
    • Total Posts 444

    Richard Evans (trainer’s son I presume) is due to ride Climate tomorrow and Aeroplane again on Friday; both for David Evans off 8 stone 12. Will be interesting to see if he makes the weight.

    #269174
    halfwaytoheaven
    Member
    • Total Posts 1387

    Richard Evans (trainer’s son I presume) is due to ride Climate tomorrow and Aeroplane again on Friday; both for David Evans off 8 stone 12. Will be interesting to see if he makes the weight.

    He’s done it before on horses such as I Confess.

    I agree though, it’ll be interesting.

    #269315
    Avatar photorobert99
    Participant
    • Total Posts 899

    It’s all in the BHA rules. Was it published on course or not noted by media?

    PART 2 – PREPARATION FOR THE RACE
    26. Publication of information about changes
    26.1 The Clerk of the Scales will cause to be displayed on the screen or number board any alterations to the following information which differs from that appearing in the official race card

    26.1.1 declared horses,
    26.1.2 declared Riders, with allowances claimed if appropriate,
    26.1.3 the draw in any flat race,
    26.1.4 any extra weight or variation of weight or weight allowance,[/color:1u9hv1vm]
    26.1.5 colours, and
    26.1.6 any declaration that a horse is wearing

    26.1.6.1 a hood,
    26.1.6.2 blinkers,
    26.1.6.3 visor,
    26.1.6.4 eyeshield,
    26.1.6.5 eyecover,
    26.1.6.6 cheek pieces (sheepskin or otherwise), or
    26.1.6.7 any combination of the items in Paragraphs 26.1.6.1 to 26.1.6.6, or
    26.1.6.8 a tongue strap.

    #271470
    Glenn
    Participant
    • Total Posts 2003

    Was there a last second announcement of some hefty overweight today or did someone’s cat jump on their wife’s laptop?

    Ten seconds before they jumped Aeroplane was 4.9. Five seconds before they jumped the right hand side of the screen had been punched through to make him 5.8. :shock:

    #271482
    barry dennis
    Member
    • Total Posts 398

    another disgrace today lingfield, . freddies girl 1.00 pm jockey put up 2pound overweight public not informed till very late, horse drifted from 9/4 out to 4/1.

    should refund everybody who backed it, disgrace.

    #271516
    carvillshill
    Participant
    • Total Posts 2778

    I suppose you refunded all of your losing punters BD?

    #271537
    Glenn
    Participant
    • Total Posts 2003

    They’re certainly making this horse earn its corn. Back out again, less than 24 hours later, at Lingfield tomorrow.

    #271541
    bagnallc
    Member
    • Total Posts 132

    They’re certainly making this horse earn its corn. Back out again, less than 24 hours later, at Lingfield tomorrow.

    Wonder what weight it will be. Ho ho

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.