The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

A "Real" Welfare Issue at Lingfield?

Home Forums Horse Racing A "Real" Welfare Issue at Lingfield?

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #20051
    Avatar photoCav
    Participant
    • Total Posts 4833

    Ian Mongan not happy with the polytrack kickback.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2011/oc … s-kickback

    #374491
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Total Posts 17716

    Caught this interview (instigated by Ian Mongan himself), and if the jockeys are prepared to stick their neck out to this length, then it’s a real problem.
    More power to their elbow.

    #374506
    Avatar photoyeats
    Participant
    • Total Posts 3700

    Let’s hope the BHA & the RSPCA are on the case first thing this morning, this cannot be allowed to continue, horses could be seriously injured here.

    #374507
    Avatar photoCav
    Participant
    • Total Posts 4833

    True, Yeats.

    Will make both parties look like absolute hypocrites considering their current stance on the whip if racing takes place there again before this problem is cleared up.

    We can’t have racing at a venue where the eyesight of an animal is put at risk surely?

    #374508
    jose1993
    Member
    • Total Posts 1228

    I’m not going to aim to discredit what Mongan said regarding safety, but it looked a "normal" Lingfield meeting with kickback nowhere near as severe as Southwell. That said, Arena have

    almost

    acknowledged the track is worn out, and from that they should be moving urgently to replace the track, not putting it off until the back-end of 2012.

    #374512
    Avatar photoDrone
    Participant
    • Total Posts 6344

    I believe relatively few horses on the AW are fitted with Eyeshields

    If ocular injury is a concern wouldn’t it be a wise (and very simple) step to make these mandatory?

    Or are we going to have to put up with another interminable bout of circuitous debate, this time concerning the ‘safety’ of AW tracks?

    Many a NH horse has returned caked in mud and debris after a trundle on bottomless ground. Have any ever been blinded?

    #374513
    Avatar photoCav
    Participant
    • Total Posts 4833

    Or are we going to have to put up with another interminable bout of circuitous debate, this time concerning the ‘safety’ of AW tracks?

    Doubt it. This racing takes place on wet Tuesday afternoons when nobody is watching.

    http://www.auburnfootball.com/GIFS/sdb70750.gif

    #374550
    Avatar photoquadrilla
    Participant
    • Total Posts 501

    Professional eye protection for horses in dangerous sports.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iY1xVgtmdvk

    http://www.foxproline.com/english/products.htm

    Backing two runners is the relentless pursuit of value. Backing each way is a shortcut to the poor house. Only 7% make a long term profit.

    #374562
    Avatar photoJJMSports
    Participant
    • Total Posts 2034

    The irony in the same amount of headlines this gets compared to the ‘whip’ debate won’t suprise most people on here.

    #374757
    Avatar photoaji
    Member
    • Total Posts 469

    There are many real horse welfare issues to address. The RSPCA and the rest should be looking at the thousands of horses that are abused every week at riding stables where whip-happy children are encouraged to thrash ponies with real riding crops. Instead their attention is on profressional riders using pieces of foam. So it’s not really about horse welfare, it’s about politics and perception.

    So, no, I can’t see anyone caring about the track at Lingfield.

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.