The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

Welsh National 2017

Home Forums Big Races – Discussion Welsh National 2017

Viewing 17 posts - 69 through 85 (of 170 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1335447
    moehat
    Participant
    • Total Posts 9329

    Was reading Go Down to the Beaten last night and it mentioned that fact that the Welsh National was ran after the GN but before the Scottish in days gone by. I think someone mentioned that earlier in the thread.

    #1335448
    FrankieMac
    Participant
    • Total Posts 187

    My Ladbrokes bet stand. No complaints from me although my wallet would be better off if they were voided !

    #1335454
    Avatar photoGingertipster
    Participant
    • Total Posts 33167

    No ham – unless they’ve changed recently – my understanding is bookmakers usually let ante-post bets go forward to the resceduled race, provided it’s over the same course and distance which this is. ie When rescheduled races are at different tracks ante-post bets are void. Corals deal looks very fair. Exchanges I believe void all bets.

    Might be worth TRFers checking with their bookmaker before potentially doubling up.

    Value Is Everything
    #1335456
    ham
    Participant
    • Total Posts 3489

    The entries re-opened? As far as im aware ginge, everyone else voided without having to “ask”

    #1335457
    LostSoldier3
    Blocked
    • Total Posts 1874

    Folsom Blue non-runner according to ATR.

    #1335462
    FrankieMac
    Participant
    • Total Posts 187

    As I said ham, Ladbrokes haven’t, even after “asking”

    #1335463
    Avatar photoGingertipster
    Participant
    • Total Posts 33167

    Ah, “entries re-opened” might help explain things, but why are some bookmakers seemingly different then, LS? :unsure:

    Value Is Everything
    #1335465
    Avatar photoGingertipster
    Participant
    • Total Posts 33167

    Phillip Hobbs is probably relieved with the postponement. In poor form at Christmas, but 1 winner, 2 seconds and 2 thirds from his last 10 runners… Not yet what I’d call in “good form”, but not “poor” either. Rock The Kasbah has a better chance now. Sharif don’t like him though.

    Value Is Everything
    #1335466
    LostSoldier3
    Blocked
    • Total Posts 1874

    It’s a concession guys – designed to be a goodwill gesture to people who got on at a good price who would be upset to see their bet voided, market rewritten and their value gone.

    Everybody’s happy…in theory!

    #1335468
    Avatar photoGingertipster
    Participant
    • Total Posts 33167

    I understand Corals offer, LS. But not why Frankie didn’t get his money back from Ladbrokes.

    Value Is Everything
    #1335470
    LostSoldier3
    Blocked
    • Total Posts 1874

    I can’t quite get my head around what Frankie is saying – when did he place the bet and what was he expecting to happen?

    Sorry, I know I’m being slow with this one.

    #1335473
    ham
    Participant
    • Total Posts 3489

    Its a strange one, as far as im aware, the bet should be void because the entries re-opened, as at the 5 day stage most of the “big antepost prices” have gone, so punters make there selection based on the field whos declared at that point

    So not refunding people who placed there bets after the 5 day decs but still antepost are at a disadvantage, a much bigger disadvantage to those who took the nicer prices if not refunded as technically the field they knew (or near enough) was lining up could have totally changed (im not sure if it actually has) but hypothetically it could have,

    Not an expert on this, so someone may very well prove me wrong, i got a refund on CTS, cant mind from whom, but i didnt ask. I just assumed under these circumstances it would have been standard, for all it would have been with all the grade 1 races around it anyway

    #1335494
    Mike007
    Participant
    • Total Posts 7808

    My bookie offered me refunds but have kept faith in the 2 I backed which I got at bigger prices.

    #1335508
    tony321
    Participant
    • Total Posts 368

    They seem confident of the meeting going ahead despite the weather although will be omitting the 4th down the back and one down the home straight, hope it doesn’t end up like Exeter on Monday as you may as well abandon it

    #1335515
    FrankieMac
    Participant
    • Total Posts 187

    I can’t quite get my head around what Frankie is saying – when did he place the bet and what was he expecting to happen?

    Sorry, I know I’m being slow with this one.

    I didn’t expect anything would happen – I’m a bit naive and just assumed the bet would still remain valid for the re-arranged race date. However, as people on here seemed to be suggesting all bets would be voided I asked Ladbrokes the question. They confirmed the bet remained valid.

    #1335522
    Avatar photoBigG
    Participant
    • Total Posts 13314

    Folsom Blue non-runner according to ATR.

    LS, it certainly doesn’t look very good for Folsom Blue, as half the
    firms have taken him off their books. I was unaware and can’t seem to
    find a quote anywhere saying he is a non runner or unlikely to run.
    Do you have a link, or do you know if it came from Elliot or elsewhere ?

    #1335530
    Flyers Nap
    Participant
    • Total Posts 282

    Hi BigG
    LS3 is correct…..info given on ATR,Gary O Brien is part owner.
    Horse pulled out of box today a little lame, was reason given.
    If only all connections were this transparent.
    Credit to them for announcing so swiftly,unfortunate so close to race.

    Back to the drawing board,also liked his chance at the weights.

Viewing 17 posts - 69 through 85 (of 170 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.