The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

TRF Order of Merit Comp – Week 17 (ASC, HAY, & WCN)

Home Forums Racing Competitions TRF Order of Merit Comp – Week 17 (ASC, HAY, & WCN)

Viewing 12 posts - 18 through 29 (of 29 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #143768
    Avatar photoroland
    Member
    • Total Posts 302

    105 NO REFUGE 1PT EW
    225 RACING DEMON 1PT EW
    245 BEWLEYS BERRY 2PT WIN
    340 KATCHIT 2PT WIN

    #143769
    lorddenning
    Member
    • Total Posts 39

    13:05 Wichita Lineman
    14:25 Monet’s Garden
    14:45 Philson Run
    15:40 Katchit

    2 pts win .

    #143777
    Pat123
    Participant
    • Total Posts 3078

    2.25 – Monet’s Garden (ew)
    2.45 – Harrycone Lewis (ew)
    3.40 – Katchit (win)

    #143780
    Anzum
    Member
    • Total Posts 256

    1.05 – Wichita Lineman 2pts win
    2.25 – Howle Hill 1pt e.w
    2.45 – Sixo 2pts win

    #143787
    Avatar photocormack15
    Keymaster
    • Total Posts 9308

    Lough Derg
    Geeveem

    #143844
    Avatar photoGazs Way De Solzen
    Member
    • Total Posts 2440

    How come Naunton Brook is actually running in the 3.10 at Wincanton but on the Racing Post site he was down to run in the 2.45 at Haydock.

    I picked him for the 2.45 race.

    :x :x :x

    #143846
    Grey Desire
    Participant
    • Total Posts 1937

    3.10 at Wincanton,he was declared twice with preference for that race.

    #143848
    Avatar photoGazs Way De Solzen
    Member
    • Total Posts 2440

    Surely they must make a decision before the day of the races themselves? ? ?

    #143867
    Avatar photoDrone
    Participant
    • Total Posts 6162

    Double declarations at two different meetings are by no means uncommon, particularly when there is a doubt about one/both meetings taking place due to adverse weather (frost) or likely going changes due to rain. Naunton Brook wasn’t declared a non-runner at Haydock until 12.30 which was admittedly a little late as Wincanton passed an inspection at 11.00.

    On the RP racecard double declarations are posted as ‘preferred engagement’ and ‘also engaged at’: NB’s ‘preferred engaement’ was Wincanton.

    Due to 48hr declarations made on Friday for Sunday, horse’s doubly declared on both Saturday and Sunday is quite common, with the result that Sunday tends to suffer from non-runners who raced on the Saturday.

    It’s all legal and above board but for the punter not an ideal scenario. I just wish trainers would declare their horse a non-runner as soon as intentions are decided.

    Edit: Incidentally, double decs, along with multiple 5-day decs can be useful to punters in that they suggest a trainer is keen to run a fit horse, and if the ‘preferred engagement’ is over a different trip/on different going/different class than the ‘also engaged at’ then it’s a helpful insight into the conditions under which a trainer would prefer his charge to run in.

    All grist to the punting mill

    #143879
    Avatar photoGazs Way De Solzen
    Member
    • Total Posts 2440

    Thanks guys.

    I’m only angry because i selected him for the competition and thought he would run well in the Haydock race.

    :wink: :wink: :wink:

    #143882
    Avatar photograysonscolumn
    Participant
    • Total Posts 6994

    I sympathise, Gareth – the Haydock race seemed a more logical option than taking on borderline Gold Cup aspirants over a trip shy of his best.

    gc

    Jeremy Grayson. Son of immigrant. Adoptive father of two. Metadata librarian. Freelance point-to-point / horse racing writer, analyst and commentator wonk. Loves music, buses, cats, the BBC Micro, ale. Advocate of CBT, PACE and therapeutic parenting. Aspergers.

    #144017
    Avatar photoGazs Way De Solzen
    Member
    • Total Posts 2440

    Those were my thoughts too Jeremy.

    Thought the race at Haydock looked ideal for him.

Viewing 12 posts - 18 through 29 (of 29 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.