Home › Forums › Horse Racing › Tote Exacta at Catterick
- This topic has 11 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 5 months ago by
grey dolphin.
- AuthorPosts
- December 3, 2014 at 17:03 #27143
Is the race 3 exacta correct???
1st 66/1
2nd 66/1Div – 701.80
Cant be right surely?
December 3, 2014 at 17:38 #497287Why can’t it be right?
December 3, 2014 at 17:41 #497289Thought they were missing a zero.
Jesus that’s a dreadful div.
December 3, 2014 at 17:53 #497291You sound like a man who’s bemused as to why this or that horse is ‘so short’ before it goes and trots up. Maybe the shrewd set that play exactas had a much better idea of this combo copping than you did?
December 3, 2014 at 17:56 #497292What did the FC pay? How is it calculated?
December 3, 2014 at 18:15 #497295£2082.24
December 3, 2014 at 19:03 #497300Betting was:
Evens
5/2
11/1 barMaybe people realized that Tom Scu never wins when riding for Brian Ellison (and is generally a useless jockey anyway) so thought the 66/1 outsiders weren’t no-hopers.
December 3, 2014 at 19:05 #497301What did the FC pay? How is it calculated?
The CSF is based on SPs, but with the added twist of
Frankenstein algorithims
to ensure you get a truly dreadful deal.
So in this case, they’d multiply 66*(66+1) and get 4422. Then the harmonisation algorithim will kick in (aka the ‘we don’t wanna give you that’ algorithim) to slash the return by more than half.
Whatever you do folks, give these Frankenstein CSFs the bodyswerve and stick to the weight-of-money derived exacta.
December 4, 2014 at 09:54 #497344So in this case, they’d multiply 66*(66+1) and get 4422. Then the harmonisation algorithim will kick in (aka the ‘we don’t wanna give you that’ algorithim) to slash the return by more than half.
The CSF was a licence to print it back in the day.
Then came the Little Owl/Venture To Cognac affair and joy turned to despair.
Mike
December 4, 2014 at 11:27 #497352"You sound like a man who’s bemused as to why this or that horse is ‘so short’ before it goes and trots up. Maybe the shrewd set that play exactas had a much better idea of this combo copping than you did?"
Not at all. I’ve been espousing the use of exchange data and price movement on here for years.
Could be wrong of course, but I don’t see any shrewdie playing at 700/1 in a 4000/1+, Catterick sixteen runner juvenile hurdle market!
Nor am I saying this is a representative exacta dividend at those sort of odds. I don’t have the data to draw that conclusion.
Looks more like a name picker having their day in the sun, or finger trouble, or both.
In any event, it’s a dreadful dividend on this particular occasion imo.
December 4, 2014 at 18:39 #497380Not sure here, but it could be first or second with any other.
December 4, 2014 at 20:57 #497395How much was in the pool? For races at these small meetings midweek that is probably the main limitation.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.