THE MAJESTIC

[billion]

Way, way back in September 2003 when MrE was still a young man he posted up a thread about the RACHET plan working with THE MAJESTIC.

I have looked but cannot find any description of said MAJESTIC, so if any person out there knows of it can they please post the details because with such a name it sounds a cut above the norm.

Billy's Outback Shack

[MrE]

Hi Billion….. yes, it was a beautiful little system from what I remember, there were a few members following it at that time…… the only problem is, I can’t remember the rules…… but I know a man that can…..

Cue Daz…. the guy that was on here just over a week ago, he’s gotta still look in from time to time, so give him a shout……

DARREL

….

DARREL

…. c’mon, wake up you lazy sod, we wan’t your system rules…… hurry up or I’ll set Matron on you, that won’t be very pleasant either, I’ll bet your still sore from the last time….. it was very naughty of him to stick those electrodes up there…… c’mon Daz…. were all waiting….. well, Billion is anyway…..

MrE

[Matron]

Is this the one MrE:-

"Wed Aug 29, 2001 2:11 am

Postby darrell on Wed Aug 29, 2001 2:11 am
This system is one i devised myself,i entred this system in a comprtition for intheknow magazine.<br>It won first prize for its simplicity and profitability.Here are the system rules for you to start using.

1)ONLY USE NONE HANDICAP RACES.<br>2)PICK OUT THE HORSE THAT IS 2/1 OR MORE IN THE BETTING FORCAST ANY NEWSPAPER CAN BE USED THE RESULTS WILL NOT VARY MUCH.<br>3)YOUR SELECTION SHOULD ALSO BE DISTANCE WINNER,BUT THIS IS NOT ESSENTIAL IN MOST RACES.<br>4)YOUR SELECTION MUST ALSO HAVE BEEN PLACED 1ST 2ND OR 3RD.

This is a very simple system that as been tested on past results, by the above mentioned magazine     <br>try it yourself you will be amazed by the results and strike rate."

Regards- Matron

[billion]

Good morning Chaps, thanks for the replies.

I will try again with a follow up having lost my WiFi connection here in "Dongleland".

Four simple rules (and I do like simple) but if anyone can clarify the following it could help.

1) Non handicaps only – easy I understand rule 1

2) Pick out any horse 2/1+ in any betting forecast – Could this be just one horse, the one closest to 2/1 or ALL those 2/1+ . . .

mmmmmn!

3) Lets say, MUST be a distance winner – and delete all those not "D" winners from the 2/1+ group.

4) Must be placed 1.2.3 – guesswork here but should this be LTO?

So, looking at a group of 2/1+, remove those not "D" winners and then erase all from the remaining which did not finish 1.2.or 3 LTO.

Does this sound about right?

Applying All the above to the BIG one at R. Ascot today it leaves CANFORD CLIFFS and MAKFI

Billy's Outback Shack

[billion]

Hi

Matron

,

My archive looks to only go back to page 38 (2002ish) unless there you know better (which I think you do).

Can you explain why so many of the old postings look to be encrypted into gobbledegook.

Billy's Outback Shack

[elcartero]

Definitely in favour of keeping it simple.
Of course some races may not contain a distance winner and I would imagine that the lower priced selection (if over 2/1 in the betting forecast) would be the sole selection.
This little system may also be profitable in all aged handicaps of up to and including 8 runners.

Powered by Linux

[Matron]

Billion,

You, can only go back to Page: 38 – as well as myself.

I just managed to find it going through Darrell’s posts. (I do remember the "Majestic" as I think it was one of his first posts on "TRF".)

The "TRF" servers have been changed a few times over the years – as well as software upgrades – and unfortunately some the data has not imported well.

Regards – Matron

[billion]

‘morning

elcartero

,

Looking back Darrell made a posting saying the system hit the buffers as so many systems do following a profitable run.

Why oh why does this happen, but it does and is what makes this sport so challenging.

I have been applying a very simple filter of late with some success and could well act as either as an extra or as a breaker to find a single selection in a similar way that you suggest.

Before laying your hard earned simply check if either selection (or as a check for any sole selection) has previously won at the grade of the considered race.

Canford Cliffs & Makfi both have Gp 1 wins (is it worth dutching?)

Billy's Outback Shack

[billion]

Thanks for the reply & explaination

Matron

Billy's Outback Shack

[billion]

Still trying to make sense of

The Majestic

and with some good racing at R. Ascot today I have gone through the card with Daily Mail betting forecast.

2.30 Paco Boy 1 LTO "D" forecast 11/4 (Goldikova looks to be the other option but forecast 7/4 it does not qualify although both Calming Influence and Dalghar can be nominated).

3.05 Nicconi at 3/1 was closest to 2/1 has a big ZERO LTO, next up at 7/2 is Kingsgate Native (Equiano 8/1 and Master Manannan can also be nominated)

3.50 Canford Cliffs and Kakfi cannot be split although Canford Cliffs is closest to 2/1

4.25 Strong Suit should get the nomination at 11/4 with "D" and 1LTO but not at this level.

Billy's Outback Shack

[billion]

Just one more for

elcartero

.

Brighton 6.30 8 runner handicap

MULTAHAB selected with a "D" in the form line 2LTO and has a forecast price 11/4 (Spic N Span looks the alternative nomination at 4/1)

Billy's Outback Shack

[darrell]

hi all.
Here are the rules for the majestic boys,

none handicaps

1st 2nd or third on last current season run only

quoted favourite in betting forcast priced 2/1 or greater

won at the distance optional.

I used the sun orignally for selections, but me and mr.e eventually agreed on using the racing post, with great success.Hope you find helpfull.

Regards.
Daz

[darrell]

Bets for Royal Ascot 15.6.2010.

3.50.CANFORD CLIFFS

4.25.STRONG SUIT

5.35.METROPOLITAN MAN

Hope this helps.

Daz

[MrE]

Thanks Daz, I knew that you would still be awake and having fun with Matron….. it’s been 7 years and things haven’t changed much…. Matrons got a spanking new office (and I use the word "spanking" with due deference) and that two way mirror that he had installed at personal expense, is a real innovation…… I hope all is well with you my friend, and thanks for confirming the "Majestic" rules…..

MrE

[billion]

g’day

Daz

,

Thanks for the reply and you have taken the guesswork away.

You did say all those years ago the system was profitable for a while and then as so many systems do hit a brick wall, have you any idea why?

I have suggested any nomination must have won at the present race class (only to try and break the "brick wall" syndrome) which does cross out Strong Suit and then Metroploitan Man in the Mail was only 13/8, Mail though I guess you have taken your price from RP.

I shall be watching all afternoon with interest.

Billy's Outback Shack

[elcartero]

Thanks, Billion…I’ve been too busy today to check things out but I note that there are now 7 runners in the 9.00 Brighton making Piazza San Petro a selection.

The 10 year favourite record in the Mail is very useful…Interesting to note that no favourite has won the Queen Anne for at least 10 years so where does that leave Goldikova?

Just one more for

elcartero

.

Brighton 6.30 8 runner handicap

MULTAHAB selected with a "D" in the form line 2LTO and has a forecast price 11/4 (Spic N Span looks the alternative nomination at 4/1)

Powered by Linux

[billion]

CANFORD CLIFFS

was simply

MAJESTIC

!

Billy's Outback Shack

[Author]

Posts