The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

The ‘Language of Racing’

Home Forums Horse Racing The ‘Language of Racing’

Viewing 17 posts - 18 through 34 (of 48 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #271102
    douginho
    Member
    • Total Posts 1046

    I would guess that over the last five years or so that people playing Poker, online, in pubs, in their own homes, has grown exponentially – did Poker have to dumb down the terminology?

    Personally, I’ve never played the game and have no wish too but I do enjoy watching it on the telly and the fact that I don’t really know, as an example, what ‘having the nuts on the river card’ means I don’t believe has detracted from my enjoyment.

    This lack of confidence in the ‘Racing Product’ by our rulers and betters is a mystery to me.

    Agree with you Pompete. Instead of trying to mainstream things we should be promoting the peculiarity of our words and phrases!

    Much of the phrasology comes from commentators during races and really help to enhance a race. I saw the commentary of Rooster Booster’s champion hurdle win the other day and Simon Holt’s brilliant commentary.

    "He’s running all other this leader Intersky Falcon" makes it sound like Rooster Booster was jumping all over Intersky like a dog who spots its owner coming out of the shop! But if you saw the race it makes total sense.

    #271110
    Avatar photoDrone
    Participant
    • Total Posts 6159

    As others have mentioned all sports – and professions/practices/pastimes in general – have their own jargon, argot and colloquialisms and they are richer for it.

    Horse racing ( in its broadest sense) has a particularly long history, hence is laden with picturesque, archaic and strange phrases

    Like Cormack I found them alluring when developing an interest in the sport

    Below is a list of racing terms I compiled some years ago that have been borrowed from racing and have become – to a lesser or greater extent – figurative terms in general usage

    Some dubious and some chicken-or-egg, quite probably

    GIVE HIM HIS HEAD
    FAIR CRACK OF THE WHIP
    RUN OUT
    ODDS ON/AGAINST
    SLIPPED UP
    PUT DOWN
    STAND OFF
    LOOSE OFF
    KNUCKLE DOWN
    PIN BACK YOUR EARS
    WARNING OFF
    HANG FIRE
    HEAD IN THE AIR
    OVER REACH
    ON HIS TOES
    A RACING CERTAINTY
    ON THE NOD
    HEAVY GOING
    TAKE A TURN
    PULL UP
    TOE IN
    BET AGAINST
    JOCKEYING FOR POSITION
    DOESN’T WANT TO KNOW
    BRING DOWN
    HEAD IN FRONT
    RAN AWAY WITH
    STRAINING AT THE BIT
    TAKING HOLD OF THE BIT
    FREE REIN
    SHAKE UP
    PUSH OUT
    DEAD HEAT
    OUT GROWN
    FILL OUT
    WALKOVER
    FROM THE HORSES MOUTH
    TALKING HORSE
    STALKING HORSE
    COVER UP
    HELD UP
    GOT A LEAD
    BLINKERED
    MORNING GLORY
    A GOOD THING
    GIVE AN INCH

    #271112
    moehat
    Participant
    • Total Posts 9916

    Not a racing term, as such, but I remember Ted Walsh, on seeing a horse’s nose touch the ground after jumping a fence, refer to it as ‘genuflexing’..which I then had to look up in the dictionary. Only he could use a word like that.

    #271117
    bucketnut
    Member
    • Total Posts 63

    The phrase thats like nails down the blackboard to me is ‘three parts of a length’. Why not just say 3/4.

    #271122
    % MAN
    Participant
    • Total Posts 5104

    The phrase thats like nails down the blackboard to me is ‘three parts of a length’. Why not just say 3/4.

    I have to confess I am “guilty” of using that term quite a lot.

    I, personally, like the sound of the expression which I suppose underlines the fact we all have different preferences.

    My other reason for using it in reports is I think it looks tidier when written i.e.

    “….. won by ¾ of a length”

    or

    “won by three parts of a length”

    although I suppose “… won by three-quarters of a length” could be used instead.

    #271149
    Avatar photoThe Ante-Post King
    Participant
    • Total Posts 8696

    The phrase thats like nails down the blackboard to me is ‘three parts of a length’. Why not just say 3/4.

    I have to confess I am “guilty” of using that term quite a lot.

    I, personally, like the sound of the expression which I suppose underlines the fact we all have different preferences.

    My other reason for using it in reports is I think it looks tidier when written i.e.

    “….. won by ¾ of a length”

    or

    “won by three parts of a length”

    although I suppose “… won by three-quarters of a length” could be used instead.

    In decimal terms that would be 0.75 parts of a length!

    #271153
    Avatar photoThe Young Fella
    Blocked
    • Total Posts 2064

    "he won with his ears pricked"

    Don’t they all?

    #271156
    trevorgee
    Participant
    • Total Posts 8

    "He’s coming with a good looking run!"

    Copyright tommo 19xx

    #271157
    % MAN
    Participant
    • Total Posts 5104

    In decimal terms that would be 0.75 parts of a length!

    No – it would be 0.15 seconds :lol: (assuming the going is 5 lengths per second)

    That’s another anocrinism we should get rid of – replace lengths with proper time gaps!!!

    #271167
    Avatar photoDrone
    Participant
    • Total Posts 6159

    ate up well

    hasn’t got a bother on him

    likes to hear his hooves rattle

    unfurnished

    first lot

    cantering all over them

    pecked on landing

    jumps from fence to fence

    can’t tip sh*it from a barrow

    #271173
    Grasshopper
    Participant
    • Total Posts 2316

    Pulling double

    Hard on the steel

    Taking a pull

    Take the fractions

    Common canter

    Pinged

    Jumped them senseless

    Jumped them into the deck

    Bridle merchant

    Connections

    Trained-on

    Weight-for-age

    Useless ****

    #271198
    Ardrossthegreat
    Member
    • Total Posts 303

    You like a sport you learn about it!!!

    nuff said as far as im concerned………..too much being said about this racing for change bollox!!!. You cannot gain peoples interest by these changes…….they either like it or they dont……….. like anything really

    #271202
    Avatar photoMiss Woodford
    Participant
    • Total Posts 1700

    Some Americanisms:
    Bridgejumper
    Working with the dogs up
    Two-minute lick
    A Silky Sullivan finish (named after this horse http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FT_YxcoDhtY)
    Morning glory
    Acey-deucey
    Black type
    Mud-runnin’ fool
    Sealed
    Coupled
    Steeplethon
    Bomber
    Bug-boy
    Carryover
    Got his goat
    Bullring
    Cheap speed
    The Spa, The Big Sandy, The Big A, The Twin Spires, Old Hilltop (Saratoga, Belmont, Aqueduct, Churchill, Pimlico, respectively)

    #271235
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Total Posts 17716

    Some marvellously evocative lists here. In case anyone out there doesn’t know about it, I’d like to recommend one of my favourite bedside books.

    “Horse-racing: a book of words” is by Gerald Hammond (Carcanet 1992). It’s a dictionary of arcane and not-so-arcane racing words and phrases, explaining meaning and giving origins.

    There are some odd omissions (“yielding” springs to mind) but the book is a treasure trove. For example:

    Who out there knows what a “roper” is (or was)?
    What’s the meaning of “on velvet”?
    Who or what was a “metallician” and why?

    All these and more delights are to be found in Hammond’s lovely tome.

    #271239
    Avatar photoCav
    Participant
    • Total Posts 4833

    Useless ****

    :lol: :lol: :lol:

    #271240
    Avatar photocormack15
    Keymaster
    • Total Posts 9307

    Sounds excellent Pinza – I confess I haven’t the foggiest on any of those three terms.

    #271244
    Avatar photoKen(West Derby)
    Member
    • Total Posts 1063

    Pinza: Does the term ‘Roper’ have any link with a ‘Ringer’ please?
    K

Viewing 17 posts - 18 through 34 (of 48 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.