Home › Forums › Betting Chat – Bets & Tips › Sixties Icon looks a poor value bet
- This topic has 13 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 19 years, 8 months ago by
cormack15.
- AuthorPosts
- September 7, 2006 at 07:06 #2969
Plenty think like you EC as Bet365 report Icon as friendless all week and now 5/4 from odds on.<br>They reckon it needs to go to 6/4 before backjers come back in.<br>There has been support for Red Rocks and for Championship Point at longer odds.<br>However plenty of horses seem to be there more in hope than expectation according to connections.<br>What is your idea of the winner out of the 12 in this desperately weak "classic"?
September 7, 2006 at 09:24 #76462Jeremy Noseda is still bullish about Sixties chance but there’s no doubt that the stable are not in good form :( and I wouldn’t back him at the present price even if he is the best horse on form. I don’t see the value in it.
September 7, 2006 at 10:31 #76463EC, couldnt agree more about Sixties icon.
Am I the only one who thinks Red Rocks is massively overpriced at 5/1? Especially as he’s the only horse with proven group 1 form. That second to Rail Link could look pretty impressive after the Prix Niel – pity we have to wait until Sunday to find out!
With the ledger reduced by 155 yards, surely stamina will be much less of a factor. Would anyone agree with the assertion that RR simply went too early in the Great Voitegeur and got mugged? Was RR fighting back at the finish?
September 9, 2006 at 18:54 #76464Hes a top class trainer and its a sign of great trainers that their best runners are often seemingly unaffected by the stable’s form
Was terrific to watch :)
September 9, 2006 at 19:11 #76465Poor value?
Some of us don’t half talk some rubbish. :biggrin: ;)
September 9, 2006 at 19:15 #76466I don’t see your pre -race comments MM!!
September 9, 2006 at 19:24 #76467Quote: from cormack15 on 8:15 pm on Sep. 9, 2006[br]I don’t see your pre -race comments MM!!
<br>You should, I am amongst those speaking garbage lol. Thought Sixties Icon was an awful price at anything less than 2/1.
Impressive today to say the least. Isn’t hindsight a wonderful thing?
September 9, 2006 at 19:39 #76468Where did you say that MM – I missed it<br>
September 9, 2006 at 20:01 #76469Quote: from cormack15 on 8:39 pm on Sep. 9, 2006[br]Where did you say that MM – I missed it<br>
<br>In another thread somewhere mate can’t remember which one now. I did say he had a chance though in my defence just thought he was vulnerable particularly at a short price.
September 9, 2006 at 20:03 #76470https://theracingforum.co.uk/cgi-bin … topic=9714
<br>There you go Cormack.
September 9, 2006 at 21:55 #76471i think hes there already
he targets well and is nicely candid about his runners, a nice sign of confidence in his abilities i think
September 9, 2006 at 22:13 #76472Whilst it won easily enough, it was a very poor bet IMO. I just couldn’t have it and went for a lively outsider.<br>It illustrates what a p**s
poor race this year’s St Leger was that a, merely, above average animal could win it at such short odds. The 50/1 rag in second place backs up that analysis.September 9, 2006 at 22:36 #76473No-one offered me 5/1 in the end:( . The on course bookies were stingy too.
September 10, 2006 at 00:31 #76474Yes, I see that MM.
Fair play.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.