Home › Forums › Horse Racing › Racing Post
- This topic has 455 replies, 133 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by
Grey Desire.
- AuthorPosts
- December 12, 2006 at 20:56 #554
According to Nick Luck in tonights Evening Standard Trinity Mirror wish to sell their "cash cow"<br>The camel jockey still has titular ownership.
December 12, 2006 at 21:21 #33527It was in The Observer Business section on Sunday. It is understood that TM are looking for offers in the region of £100m.
December 12, 2006 at 21:30 #33528Putting an offer in Pru ?
December 12, 2006 at 21:40 #33529Possibly. I’m only about £99.9m short.
December 13, 2006 at 08:43 #33530Yeah .. me too !<br>
December 13, 2006 at 12:13 #33531100 million, that’s a lot of Racing Posts. I don’t know if I have enough room to store them
Err NO GOLD STAR
December 14, 2006 at 11:40 #33532LONDON (Reuters) – Trinity Mirror said it had spurned an offer for its national newspapers, as it unveiled plans to streamline the business by selling its sports unit, including the Racing Post, and some regional titles.
The group (TNI.L: Quote, Profile , Research), which owns the Daily Mirror and Sunday Mirror, launched a review in August after posting a drop in profits due to a weak ad environment and falling circulation.
Trinity said on Thursday it had considered separating its regional and national businesses by way of a full demerger but concluded that would not benefit shareholders.
It said several third parties contacted the group about acquiring a number of its assets including one conditional indicative offer for the nationals businesses but the board concluded it "substantially undervalued" it.
The firm said it expected the disposals, including the Birmingham Post, the Birmingham Evening Mail, Coventry Evening Telegraph, Croydon Advertiser and South London Press, are to be completed during the second and third quarter of 2007.
It plans to focus on its national newspapers which also include the People and Daily Record newspapers and key regional titles in Scotland, the north of England and Wales and its digital assets.
It said it would integrate its print and online operations more closely.
December 14, 2006 at 18:00 #33533For an estimate £200m the RP is yours
December 14, 2006 at 18:43 #33534Other estimates are up to 250m or even 300m. Seems a lot, but it’s making loads of money already, has a guaranteed monopoly and there are plenty of "revenue streams" yet to be developed, particularly online.
December 14, 2006 at 20:04 #33535Quote: from Mr Frisk on 6:43 pm on Dec. 14, 2006[br]Other estimates are up to 250m or even 300m. Seems a lot, but it’s making loads of money already, has a guaranteed monopoly and there are plenty of "revenue streams" yet to be developed, particularly online.
Yes like the possibility/probability of charging for the information which we all take for granted now.
December 14, 2006 at 20:20 #33536…at which point the RP’s sources of info could start charging it for the info which in turn it takes for granted.
hell, we could all start charging each other for everything…  ;)
best regards
wit<br>(already non-user, and only very occasional reader, of RP)
edited to add:
i guess £150m wouldn’t be much in a grander scheme of things for the likes of Sky, Hills, Ladbrokes – or even someone new looking to combine its database with a purchase of the Tote…. <br>
(Edited by wit at 8:14 am on Dec. 15, 2006)
March 18, 2008 at 10:16 #7144Any ideas if and when we will have to start to pay to access the online site?
Heard rumours that it was going to be around a £10pm
March 18, 2008 at 10:17 #152197If that’s correct it’s a joke.
I’ll be straight over to the Sporting Life.
March 18, 2008 at 11:11 #152209ah well i still have £11 with them.thats one month and then delete it from my computer
March 18, 2008 at 11:16 #152211If that’s correct it’s a joke.
I’ll be straight over to the Sporting Life.
Why is it a joke? It contains a very comprehensive database, and thorough race analysis, comments, etc stretching back many years.
Why would you think this should be free?
Sporting life is very poor compared with the RP..
March 18, 2008 at 12:09 #152231Not sure if it correct but perhaps some of our friends in the press could confirm.
March 18, 2008 at 12:10 #152233Its a good site but I don’t pay to access any website Salselon and I never will.
What other sporting websites charge? I’m not paying £10 for one site when I pay £17.99 for the rest of the internet put together.
I used to feel the same about RUK until the Setanta package came with it.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.