- This topic has 244 replies, 52 voices, and was last updated 19 years, 1 month ago by
.
- Posts
.. it’s all true and I want a free copy of the book please corm.
How do I get hold of one ?
I see all the illuminati bookies and tissue compilers are on here trying to debunk the table, before the lads have even had a chance of getting down to the bottom of it. Wallace and TDK especially, shame on your unblinking reptilian eyes !!
<br>I wonder if the City of London police have read this.
They are always on the look out for punters that have been defrauded in a conspiracy!
AP
Since the author’s opening topic on racing ‘inside information’ was posted, corporate and independent bookmaking business ‘connections’, some having hired the Betting Code author on a consultancy basis, have expressed extreme anger at seeing a free rollout of betting code inside information.
To further clarify the author’s position. Many professionals in the bookmaking industry who have a vested interest in maintaining racing ‘inside information’ confidentiality also monitor this forum, among others. The author repeats publicly, as he has expressed to ‘connections’ privately. Codebreaking (decrypting) racing ‘inside information’ is a cutting-edge cryptographic technique that is fairly simple to apply when done so as part of a betting codebreaking team (particularly at a corporate level), and nearly impossible when attempted by a single individual? However, for corporate teams or private individuals alike, when said racing ‘inside information’ is then decrypted and winningly played, it is instantly self-defeating to publicise the achievement. Typically, when a codemaker discovers that his code is broken he must change it to regain security. However, it cannot be totally changed as the Racing Post discovered (see the Racing Post example, e-pages 347-348; see also cartel bookmaker William Hill’s fixed-odds football coupon cover up, e-page 356. Furthermore, William Hill’s attempt to hide the ‘MATCH WIN PRICE’ betting odds on its single sheet [light green] ‘Weekend’ fixed-odds coupons was a countermeasure to an early set piece Betting Code disclosure in spring 2005 [see Corruption Report – Issue 18, e-page 421]. Although the old style twin sheet [darker green] coupon is still held by its betting shops, they are only available from under the counter if you pressure counter staff to release them – this is a corporate ruling to betting shop managers).
Only the betting code ‘key’ need be rotated as Auguste Kerkhoffs first proposed in 1883, ‘the security of a codesystem must not depend on keeping the cryptographic algorithm (a process or set of rules used for calculation or problem solving) secret. The security depends only on keeping the ‘keys’ secret (see e-page 137). It is to the morphing nature of those ‘keys’ that the Betting Code sets out to explore, define and cryptographically quantify.
Any inside information is worthless unless it can be marketed, and the Neural Correlates Rotation of Betting Odds (see e-page 67, note 8), a simple stringing together of reverse psychological processes (see ‘Magnificent Seven’ spreadsheet, e-page 60, yes, the ‘Magnificent Seven’ was professionally rigged), will be the centrepiece of an upcoming racing meeting breakdown for and on behalf of forum members.
Therefore, as this forum, probably the finest globally, is filled to the brim with talented and resourceful members. It would be a great pity if the Betting Code gift horse you are being offered is unceremoniously shouted down by, as dave jay eloquently id’s them, ‘illuminati bookies’ and ’tissue compilers’. But, hey, it’s your call. A call, incidentally, that several entrepreneurial bookmaking ‘connections’ have readily seized upon, see corporate page on the book’s website.
Is there a potential betting codebreaking team amongst this forum?
Incidentally, to answer apracing’s question. Yes, City of London police are Betting Code aware, especially Detective Chief Superintendent Steve Wilmott; as are Sir Callum McCarthy, Chairman, Financial Services Authority; and Peter Freeman, Chairman, Competition Commission; and Philip Collins, Chairman, Office of Fair Trading Board; and Sir Christopher Meyer, KCMG, Chairman, Press Complaints Commission; and Peter Dean, Chairman, Gambling Commission; and Geoff Thompson, Chairman, The Football Association; and most certainly Dr Peter Webbon, Chief Executive, The Horseracing Regulatory Authority; and Alistair McLean, Chief Executive, National Greyhound Racing Club, and Rene Barclay  Director, Serious Casework, The Crown Prosecution Service; and by no means last amongst a much longer list of others, David Pannick QC, Legal counsel to Kieren Fallon. And the press, ah, the press, particularly the owners of Racing Pages (e-page 421) who supply all the forecast odds to the national newspapers. But that is for another day.
And no, the author is not an ex-bookie, and nor does he gamble. Horseracing is a passion, as is his affiliation to all things cryptographic. Also note, for a short time the entire book will be on preview at http://www.lulu.com/browse/preview.php?fCID=532182 – although it is a cumbersome one page at time interface it works ok.
Alan Ridley<br>Author
AlanRidley, you are living in a different world to the rest of us on here. If you can’t recognise AP’s sarcasm there is no hope for you.
Most of the contributors to this forum have many years experience in racing/betting and a lot are full time professionals.
I feel like sending you a bill for an hour of my time wasted reading you stuff!
(Edited by Wallace at 8:22 pm on Dec. 2, 2006)
Oh, classic cloak and dagger stuff!! Look out, they might be onto you – one the cartel hear that their secrets are being revealed the only course of action will be to silence the tale-tellers I’m sure…..:o
On the plus side, after a pretty gruelling day the website associated with the book did bring a laugh to the fellas in the office…..
Mike
Appropriate that this magnificent tome is available on the Lulu.com website, coz…(altogether now)…
…It made me wanna Shout! (wave your arms now!) Shout! (shake your hips now!) Shout…..!<br>repeat ad nauseam
Mike
I just addressed that last post to myself.
Mind I have been having problems with my own cutting edge cryptographic technique recently.
Mike
I am now seriously worried about the state of mind of our illustrious Cormack. You all right m8?
Well, any newbie (clinically insane, or not) who can get a post out of bd can’t be all bad ;)<br>Nice to see you in here again barry.
This conspiracy reminds me of James Stanley .. does anyone else remember this chap from the 80’s ??
Or more importantly what happened to him?
Yes DJ – all the industry bods popping up to say it’s all rubbish – the plot thickens!!
Wallace – I’m actually worrying about myself.
To be honest, we were talking about Gamble last night in the chat room and saying he hadn’t been around for a while. I’m just wondering if THIS is what he’s been up to all these months!!!<br>
The plot thickens .. exactly corm .. this isn’t the first time I’ve read something like this either. I think I’ve got a system somewhere that says more or less the same thing.
<br>Since you obviously already know the outcome, any chance of telling me the result of the Test Match Barry – don’t know about you mate, but I’m getting a bit old for this staying up all night.
AP
I just find the premise that bookmakers go to the trouble of coding their markets to conceal inside information (or, rather, race/match fixing, as our nutty colleague seems to claim) completely and utterly ludicrous; it doesn’t even border on being sane or rational.
Mr. Ridley isn’t actually Nick Leeson, is he, trying this time to cripple an entire industry rather than just one organisation?
As far as I am aware, the ‘betting code’ was something which came to be in the States, where lines were moved in NBA markets to engineer greater profit for the bookmakers. It is, in all honesty, a tad immoral, but it’s merely (well concealed) market manipulation. Nothing more.
Dross like this only goes to convince people that breaking rules and seeking ‘less than legal’ avenues of securing an advantage is OK. It ranks (some way above, admittedly) alongside a high majority of the racing ‘services’ who advertise their extortionate services on Teletext etc, promising riches from what amounts to, in effect, cheating.
It’s about time the HRA, and similar international organisations, began to regulate this sort of thing far more closely.
(Edited by LetsGetRacing at 12:26 am on Dec. 3, 2006)
"There is absolutely no doubt that…Lucayan Prince was a false favourite, even a tailor’s dummy can see the Betting Odds Decimal Decryption Model (BODD-M) math as solid proof and testament to a rigged race."
That’s what I’ve been telling all the fellas down at the betting shop for years, but the feckers refuse to admit that they understand what a BODD-M even does ~ I mean, how thick do they think I am?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.