The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

Does darts get more viewers than racing on the BBC?

Home Forums Horse Racing Does darts get more viewers than racing on the BBC?

Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 34 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #16623
    eddie case
    Member
    • Total Posts 1214

    Seeing blanket coverage of some darts games this afternoon on BBC1 rather than horse racing coverage from Ascot does anyone know what the viewing figures would be for the respective sports/games on a Saturday afternoon?

    #325409
    Avatar photoKauto Kid
    Member
    • Total Posts 43

    Channel 4 is showing racing from Wetherby, Ascot and i think Newmarket this afternoon

    #325411
    Avatar photoricky lake
    Blocked
    • Total Posts 3003

    Eddie , good question , it got me thinking though , there are probably just as many folks who watch darts as racing

    We forget sometimes that we are a minority sport , and overall the BBC have got it right

    cheers

    Ricky

    #325453
    Avatar photoanthonycutt
    Member
    • Total Posts 980

    It matters not a jot which one has the higher viewing figures, it’s cheaper to send Colin Murray & a couple of cameras to Hull than it is to pay SIS for the feed from Ascot. Even more so if they send their own cameras.

    I don’t see how we can possibly complain to be honest.
    For those who don’t have Sky, racing is on every Saturday. Darts fans without Sky get their sport twice a year on free tv & this World Masters is only a recent addition.

    That said, there has been darts, motor racing & cricket on ITV4 this year. Things are getting better for sport on free tv, just not from the Beeb.

    Becher Chase live on BBC on November 21st by the way. Anyone know if that was always in their plans? The way the website advertises it makes it look like it’s a late addition.

    #325485
    Roseblossom
    Participant
    • Total Posts 355

    Becher Chase live on BBC on November 21st by the way. Anyone know if that was always in their plans? The way the website advertises it makes it look like it’s a late addition.

    It’s a late addition – the BBC had planned to dump it but Aintree lobbied very hard.

    Next year they’re moving the meeting to get the race covered by Ch4

    http://www.racingpost.com/news/horse-ra … ng/782925/

    #325506
    Avatar photoanthonycutt
    Member
    • Total Posts 980

    Which makes me wonder just how much the other courses lobbied the BBC, I bet they didn’t. Not for a second.

    Alot of racing’s problems are being blamed on the bookies not putting enough in, the BBC not dedicating enough time to it & the general incompetence of the BHA. All of which are fair shouts but I personally think the racecourses themselves aren’t doing nearly enough.

    #325538
    deep sensation
    Member
    • Total Posts 139

    anthonycutt
    30 Oct 2010, 15:05
    It matters not a jot which one has the higher viewing figures, it’s cheaper to send Colin Murray & a couple of cameras to Hull than it is to pay SIS for the feed from Ascot. Even more so if they send their own cameras.

    I don’t see how we can possibly complain to be honest.
    For those who don’t have Sky, racing is on every Saturday. Darts fans without Sky get their sport twice a year on free tv & this World Masters is only a recent addition.

    That said, there has been darts, motor racing & cricket on ITV4 this year. Things are getting better for sport on free tv, just not from the Beeb.

    Becher Chase live on BBC on November 21st by the way. Anyone know if that was always in their plans? The way the website advertises it makes it look like it’s a late addition.

    just to be pedantic, but where can I get this "free tv" please? I have to pay a licence fee to watch bbc et all (is it around £120 pa now?) I’ve always found it funny that people seem to think TV is free :)

    #325559
    Old Applejack
    Participant
    • Total Posts 209

    Re. the Becher Chase – at last, a bit of common sense from the Beeb.

    #325561
    Avatar photoCrepello1957
    Participant
    • Total Posts 784

    One of my students has a PT job in a bookies. He says that it’s only old people that bet on horses in there, all the young ones go on football etc. He reckons that racing is in big trouble & needs to work hard to attract a younger audience or it will be dead in a generation. Frightening thought.

    #325577
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Total Posts 17716

    He reckons that racing is in big trouble & needs to work hard to attract a younger audience or it will be dead in a generation. Frightening thought.

    He reckons wrong. Young people have a curious tendency to turn into old people, and old people (taking "old" as anything over 40) are the ones who’ve always made up the bulk of racing’s audience. It’s a sport which people tend to get attracted to later on, just as whisky replaces martini as the taste buds mature and become more sophisticated.

    Young people will not have so much spare money in the generation to come, and we have an ageing population. That’s why it is lacking in foresight or wisdom for the BHA to try, like some hip modern Christ figure, to turn racing’s whisky into martini.

    Racing should be spending its PR budget appealing not to the young, but to the middle aged and elderly. It should also, as you rightly hint, be weaning itself off the decaying link with the High Street bookmakers. The focus is now on track, and on line.

    These are not new arguments for this forum, but I sometimes think we’re in danger of hearing the received wisdoms so often that we’re brainwashed into going along with them, in spite of the fiscal facts.

    #325585
    leither
    Member
    • Total Posts 114

    I find i dont get into betting offices much now since betting online but well remember a time particularly on big meeting days or weekends when you could not get in the shops because they were packed particularly when they were next to a pub but i find now it is younger people in there now but its betting on football or these horrible gambling machines, clearly racing is facing a crisis and i wish i knew the answer.

    #325608
    Avatar photoRacing Daily
    Participant
    • Total Posts 1416

    We live in a sophisticated world nowadays, where the viewer would rather watch beer wallers down six pints while playing a pub game in front of Peggy Mitchell clones at the Circus Tavern, and football teams with the word ‘Glasgow’ in their name drubb third rate opposition week in and week out.
    Maybe the beeb could save some money by dropping the Olympics in 2012? I understand that the world tiddlywinks championship is happening around the same time?

    #325609
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Total Posts 17716

    clearly racing is facing a crisis and i wish i knew the answer.

    The nature of the crisis is misunderstood, though. It has little to do with what goes on in betting offices, and much more to do with the disparity of the various self-interested parties attempting to take over the show.

    Yes, it is a crisis when the BHA (which has limited power over events) has someone at the helm who blithely puts his mouth and his money in wildly different places; and when they spend so much of the money they

    do

    have on foolish, footling tinkering with marketing the Pattern.

    Focus now needs to be on the

    Tote

    , which offers the only long term solution to the fiscal conundrum: but of course with the self-interested parties busy pushing their own agendas, the Tote is the

    last

    thing they care about!

    #325610
    Smithy
    Member
    • Total Posts 720

    I love racing. I also enjoy watching the darts. I doubt I am alone. As Ricky Lake pointed out, racing is a minority sport as well, albeit not in the eyes of this forum.

    #325617
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Total Posts 17716

    I love racing. I also enjoy watching the darts. I doubt I am alone. As Ricky Lake pointed out, racing is a minority sport as well, albeit not in the eyes of this forum.

    At the risk of repeating myself, the concept of

    "minority sport"

    does not hold water, unless you accept that

    every

    sport is a minority interest. The majority of the British people is not that interested in sport, any more than it is interested in politics, the arts or anything much else outside work and family.

    Looking at the minority of citizens who

    are

    significantly interested in sport, enough to spend money on it, go to it or bet on it, horse racing is the

    second most popular

    in the country, next to football – however the media choose to cut it. And it is a good second. Fact.

    #325620
    Avatar photoanthonycutt
    Member
    • Total Posts 980

    just to be pedantic, but where can I get this "free tv" please? I have to pay a licence fee to watch bbc et all (is it around £120 pa now?) I’ve always found it funny that people seem to think TV is free :)

    My point should have been that racing fans pay their licence fee, darts fans pay theirs too. We get at least 60 days of coverage a year, darts gets 16. So let’s cut the BBC a bit of slack this time.

    It’s only just occured to me, so there’s no reason why it should have occured to anyone else, but Channel 4 despite being a commercial station is also part funded by the licence fee.

    I’ve always found it funny that when people are being pedantic, they often get simple things like the ‘quote’ option wrong along with basic punctuation & capital letters. Maybe that’s just me.

    (PS Pinza is right. Racing is not a minority sport, if it were there wouldn’t be two tv channels exclusively dedicated to it.)

    #325626
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Total Posts 17716

    Racing is not a minority sport, if it were there wouldn’t be two tv channels exclusively dedicated to it.

    Yes indeed. Unfortunately, if you’ve more than a passing interest in sport nowadays, you’re going to have to pay for your pleasure. You can watch every race in the UK and Ireland (plus loads else from America, France and elsewhere) live, online, for as little as £15.98 per month. Is that unreasonable?

    Racing people are a lot better off on "free" terrestrial TV than cricket and football fans – how many test matches or Premiership games are shown

    live

    on BBC, ITV or Channel 4? And how many Racing Group 1’s (answer to latter =

    all of them!

    )

    This seems to me something to be grateful for, and a recognition that racing is in no meaningful sense under-represented on terrestrial TV.

Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 34 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.