- This topic has 48 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 8 months ago by
.
- Posts
John
Congratulations on an excellent winner today.
I see from one of your early posts that your approach is a "convoluted offshoot of VDW". Another couple of winners and even the most closed-minded of contributors whose posts I’ve been reading with amusement on the VDW thread may be getting Mr Peach’s booklets out again!
Thanks John, got on at 5/2 after reading your post eariler this afternoon, it wasnt 20/1 like last sat but if your passing somerset at anytime pop into Taunton and i’ll buy you a pint.
Charles Darwin to conquer the World
johngringo
Was CAVENDISH in the 19:45 at YAR a condender ?
Paddy Power knocked back my £0.37 bet.
Hi Quadrilla,
No, Cavendish would not have been considered.
My selections are confined solely to C2 hcps.
There is nothing more this weekend, but there might be something on Tuesday.
John,
Very well done with your selections to date. As you are one of the VDW cognoscenti, can I ask if A. King is putting what I believe is known as the "compress" into practice in today’s Scottish National?
Regards,
GoodlifeCormack,
There are so many takes on VDW that the answer to your question has to be yes. In my own case I am seen by some as a dreadful heretic as I do not regard consistency as being important. Whilst it is true that most winners have been consistent, their consistency is not the reason they win, therefore consistency is only a statistical tool and as such is inherently misleading.
Goodlife,
I think that Mr King has seriously annoyed his peers by declaring Halcon Genelardais. If either the latter or Old Benny doesn’t win he’s going to look foolish and will have to scurry away from the track to preserve his honour!
Simply dreadful betting conditions but as the primary objective is to test the theory then discipline must be maintained.
Two in the 340R:
Highland Legacy 1pt
Saddler’s Kingdom 1ptCape Hawk 505S 1pt
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.