Home › Forums › Archive Topics › British handicapping system
- This topic has 18 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 24 years, 1 month ago by
Kifill.
- AuthorPosts
- April 4, 2002 at 13:02 #99053
Sal, I think you are correct in saying Majed’s rating is based on his hurdling form. I don’t have a problem with the way those type of horses are handicapped, there has got to be a system, its never going to please everyone.
The area I do agree with Raymondo on; is the fact that an experienced, seasoned chased can be kept out of a race like the GN by a horse that has not raced over fences for some time. There is a minimum age limit for the race, maybe there should be an even more stringent quality threshold, and an experience threshold that all runners have to meet. It would be a nightmare to enforce, but is it right that a horse should be able to run from stones out of the handicap? Is it right that a 5yo with ten completed chases to his name can’t run…but a 9yo who has only had a few runs over fences & fell on occasions can? Is it right that Majed whose last nine races have been hurdles, should be allowed to run? I’d be saying no to those types of question.
I think if these type of controls were in place, you would get an even more competitive race, & maybe one with fewer casualties, thus making it a bit more palettable to the non-racing public.
As an aside (& honestely not Pipe bashing), maybe the trainer deliberately campaigned Majed that way (not getting him a chasing mark, knowing full well that was his only real chance of getting the horse into the race proper). A little bit sneaky, but I don’t think any rules have been broken.
<br>
April 7, 2002 at 16:02 #99054“I might be wrong about this, but I think he has this rating because he hasn’t yet run over fences in this country so his hurdle rating (143) cannot be amended to take a chase run into account.”
I cannot make this out.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.