The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

BBC pulls plug on Ceefax racing

Home Forums Horse Racing BBC pulls plug on Ceefax racing

Viewing 17 posts - 35 through 51 (of 70 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #114797
    Avatar photoyeats
    Participant
    • Total Posts 3457

    It says page 115 on ATR for Wolves betting, no betting appears but page 115 of RUK comes up on mine.

    #114798
    Venusian
    Participant
    • Total Posts 1665

    Racing is not seen by the BBC as a politically correct or fashionable sport. The thinking there is more likely to be along those lines than any concept of service

    Look at the sports covered by their own Radio 5 in the evenings. Formula one (what do they find to talk about for more than 10 minutes ffs), Boxing (how many watch that now), athletics (discredited and finished)….but no programme for racing…which at the very least has plenty of conversation points

    Yes, indeed, althought they might legitimately be able to fill rather more than 10 minutes tonight in the light of today’s developments in Paris!

    But, as far as BBC radio sport is concerned, if it ain’t football, it’s of no importance. Every Friday lunchtime at 1pm on radio 5 there’s a "sports panel discussion", and when they have to talk about a sport other than football, the contributors get a kind of flat tone to their voice, and don’t actually discuss the sports event itself, but waffle about the sport in general.

    It’s certainly not confined to racing (we don’t need to become paranoid about it) – last month when Suzi Perry was trying to discuss the British Moto GP event, all the panellists were prepared to do was slag off the sport, one contribution being that he’d been to a motorcycle meeting as a small boy and found it too noisy. Basically, they were pissed off with having to talk about a non-football sport, and were too lazy to bother to prepare for anything else .To her great credit, Perry took it all in good part, but underneath she must have been seething.

    If you tune in tomorrow, don’t expect to hear any chat about the St Leger!

    #114799
    steveh31
    Participant
    • Total Posts 1927

    I never said it was perfect I remebber when I used to watch American racing the ATR text used to stop at midnight even though the show carried on. We need to find out who does the text service and complain.

    Was late starting this afternoon though they missed the pre betting at Doncaster

    #114824
    The Judge
    Member
    • Total Posts 74

    I find Ceefax the fastest, most reliable source for course inspection news in the winter mornings. It’s a shame as most of the analogue service had transferred successfully to the digital service on bbci. Meanwhile, Teletext on 4 on Freeview can be painfully slow.

    #114827
    strawbear
    Participant
    • Total Posts 229

    very sad to hear ceefax is being dumped. its always the first port of call for results, as others have stated the text service on ATR is rubbish and its a 50/50 chance wether or not its working. also, i find ceefax fantastic for going and advanced goings, even stating which courses are watering. on the other hand (unless i’m blind, please advise) i cannot find any going descriptions on the ATR website, not even for tomorrows racing. just another fly in the ointment of punter v bookmaker.

    #114829
    davidjohnson
    Member
    • Total Posts 4491

    RUK’s text service is worse. From what I can recall, it doesn’t carry any Irish results. Must be pretty confident that you’ll come back to them if they actively encourage you to switch to another channel.

    #115137
    Avatar photoAndyRAC
    Participant
    • Total Posts 748

    Racing is not seen by the BBC as a politically correct or fashionable sport. The thinking there is more likely to be along those lines than any concept of service

    Look at the sports covered by their own Radio 5 in the evenings. Formula one (what do they find to talk about for more than 10 minutes ffs), Boxing (how many watch that now), athletics (discredited and finished)….but no programme for racing…which at the very least has plenty of conversation points

    Yes, indeed, althought they might legitimately be able to fill rather more than 10 minutes tonight in the light of today’s developments in Paris!

    But, as far as BBC radio sport is concerned, if it ain’t football, it’s of no importance. Every Friday lunchtime at 1pm on radio 5 there’s a "sports panel discussion", and when they have to talk about a sport other than football, the contributors get a kind of flat tone to their voice, and don’t actually discuss the sports event itself, but waffle about the sport in general.

    It’s certainly not confined to racing (we don’t need to become paranoid about it) – last month when Suzi Perry was trying to discuss the British Moto GP event, all the panellists were prepared to do was slag off the sport, one contribution being that he’d been to a motorcycle meeting as a small boy and found it too noisy. Basically, they were pissed off with having to talk about a non-football sport, and were too lazy to bother to prepare for anything else .To her great credit, Perry took it all in good part, but underneath she must have been seething.

    If you tune in tomorrow, don’t expect to hear any chat about the St Leger!

    Couldn’t agree more!!!
    I like a lot of sports, including football, but I’m sick to death of it being rammed down my throat every minute, every hour, every day. Agree as well about the way presenters are totally useless if not talking about football. Hello, wake up there are other fantastic cports out there, including Racing. It’s a disgrace the way they have treated the sport. Their argument over Ceefax holds no water, if viewers can get their info on the net, why not do it for all sports, so there is no need for Ceefax.
    How many meetings have they simply not bothered with this year? Ascot,Haydock, Goodwood, etc, they used to cover them, and on week days, so why not any more? Couldn’t make it any more plainer that they hate the sport.

    #115327
    Avatar photoTMWANG50
    Member
    • Total Posts 69

    In a word "horrified" somes up this statement from the BBC.

    I to am a Virgin subscriber where nothing works and no red button racing. Why should someone pay for a service that is essentially free and supplied by William Hill to promote itself anyway? There are a lot of people who don’t have the internet or where work has banned internet gambling (my job including) so ceefax was always a free and easy alternative.

    I love analogue Ceefax and almost addicted to the sports pages the new text on bbc-i and sky is just not as good I’m afraid.

    I can’t believe the Beeb would rather show womens football, gymnastics and drug based athletics over the sport of kings.

    Am I just an old dragon or am I right to stand my ground on ceefax something that I grew up with why should it play second fiddle to the internet?

    #115329
    Avatar photoTMWANG50
    Member
    • Total Posts 69

    can we petition to beeb to "save racing" I wonder?

    #115330
    clivex
    Member
    • Total Posts 3420

    I can’t believe the Beeb would rather show womens football, gymnastics and drug based athletics over the sport of kings

    I can…. unfortunately

    Without sounding like a Richard littlejohn (and i emphactically am not) these are very "politically correct" sports

    athletics gets lumps of coverage…but how many people actually follow it?

    Radio five is a bit of a disgrace these days.

    #115331
    Avatar photoTMWANG50
    Member
    • Total Posts 69

    I’ve just put in an offical complaint on line with the Dweeb and would encourage any other ceefax lovers to do the same, not that they will listen but this is a democratic society after all!!

    #115332
    Avatar photograysonscolumn
    Participant
    • Total Posts 6966

    I can’t believe the Beeb would rather show womens football, gymnastics and drug based athletics over the sport of kings

    I can…. unfortunately

    Without sounding like a Richard littlejohn (and i emphactically am not) these are very "politically correct" sports

    An exaggeration, perhaps. The posho, still essentially socially exclusive sports of rugby union and rowing are still more than adequately served, whilst at the other end of the class spectrum so is darts.

    I’d regard the incumbent BBC Sports regime as being ignorant of racing for the greater part compared to its forebears, rather than of being in active pursuit of an agenda of right-on sports to the exclusion of all else.

    gc

    Adoptive father of two. The patron saint of lower-grade fare. A gently critical friend of point-to-pointing. Kindness is a political act.

    #115342
    Adrian
    Participant
    • Total Posts 1041

    Happiness is – surfing Channel 660 whilst lying in bed!

    In the great scheme of things racing’s outsourced coverage on ceefax must have been a cheap product and I’m so disappointed that they have dropped it before the analogue service is switched off.

    If we can have pages dedicated to the Blue Square Premiership line-ups (which as a Cambridge United fan I also surf….) why have they felt the need to drop racing??

    #115351
    Avatar photoPompete
    Member
    • Total Posts 2390

    I’ve no problem with the BBC showing the Women’s Football. I think the standard is sufficently high to warranty it, notwithstanding it is a World Cup, and it makes a refreshing change from the Premiership. Equally, I found the BBC’s coverage of last year’s (or was it this year? :? ) Commonwealth Games, with sports such as: Badminton, Squash, Bowls, Tabletennis etc, well presented and very enjoyable. And of course, who could forget the night of Britain’s Curling success at the Olympics again brought to us by the BBC. So, I don’t view this as being, or should be, a Racing v Others debate/decision. I think all sports should be represented in proportion by a Public Service Broadcaster.

    What I find perplexing about this decision is fact the BBC are unable to reconise, and unwilling to promote or support a quailty service, which I view Ceefax Racing as being, within the scope of its remit of course. Therefore, I as others on here, can only view this as part of a strategic decision already taken that will eventually lead to the BBC withdrawing from racing altogether, perhaps with the exception of The National.

    #115541
    Nor1
    Member
    • Total Posts 384

    Is it any wonder the BBC would eventually withdraw from supporting horse racing?
    They were lambasted and derided whilst investigating undesirable activities within the sport, and have seen some of the culprits they exposed then continue to this day.

    #115575
    Venusian
    Participant
    • Total Posts 1665

    So why do they continue to cover football and athletics?

    #115581
    Nor1
    Member
    • Total Posts 384

    I understood live coverage of football on BBC was on the wane. Yet another sport investigated by them for corruption.
    Look what has happened to dog racing, wrestling, boxing and cricket.
    Athletics does not have that much coverage apart from major events.

Viewing 17 posts - 35 through 51 (of 70 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.