Home › Forums › Horse Racing › Arkle Chase
- This topic has 18 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 19 years, 4 months ago by
Shadow Leader.
- AuthorPosts
- January 22, 2007 at 13:39 #735
I’m surprised Schindlers Hunt wasn’t entered in this (he is entered in the RSA Ch). He has raced 12 times under Rules, none of which have been longer than 20f. He is entered in the Irish Arkle this Sunday over 17f and if he were to win that, he would have been a live contender for the Arkle. I appreciate the whole "better ground – longer trip" theory but if it were to come up soft on Arkle day, you’ld have to think connections would be kicking themselves.
January 22, 2007 at 14:54 #36409I think its to protect the commentators
Try saying Schindlers Hunt quickly…
January 22, 2007 at 18:54 #36410It wasn’t entered due to a clerical error states the trainer.<br>Unlikely to go to Cheltenham, it appears bound for a race at Fairyhouse
January 22, 2007 at 20:46 #36411Cheers Lingfield. I was going to back him ante-post. First good decision for a while!
January 23, 2007 at 00:52 #36412How many likely front runners are there in this race! :o
January 23, 2007 at 16:37 #36413Well, like ive been saying for a while they are seriously considering the Arkle for Another Promise……. expected to win in Huntingdon goes ahead tomorrow……….. get on now
January 25, 2007 at 23:52 #36414Another Promise’s most likely target has been confirmed as the Arkle this year and if all is well with him next season he will be aimed at the Paddy Power Gold Cup and then see what happens there.
As some of you have also said, im not sure 2miles suits him at all, i think he may get taken off his feet but they say he is quite capable and with a strong pace and Cheltenham being as stiff as it is they really fancy him, they can drop him and pick horses off one by one.
I can’t 100% confirm that he will go for the Arkle, i havent had it from the trainers mouth but after he won at Huntingon my mate told me "he goes for the Arkle now".
Ive backed him, and as long as he lines up he shouldnt be anymore than 20’s on the day in my opinion, probably less……… so i can have quite a few bets for ‘nothing’ as it were.
January 26, 2007 at 11:26 #36415Any opinions on Faasel for this? Thought he jumped welll at Catterick the other day. Okay, he didnt beat that much, but he won nicely enough. He was close to top class over hurdles before his form tailed off.
Has shown good form at Cheltenham.
One to be interested in, mabe?
January 26, 2007 at 11:31 #36416In all honesty stormont it was a dreadful race. I said on the day of the race he ought to bolt up hard-held and though he did his hurdle form was 30lb better. He hasn’t done anything to warrant consideration yet imo.
January 26, 2007 at 11:53 #36417Faasel is a pig that won’t want to know when he gets in a real race.
January 26, 2007 at 12:13 #36418I had a few quid on him at 50’s a while ago just as a speculative punt, I guess he’s probably closer to 25’s now but I would have liked him to have beaten euro american further than he did..
DJ, i’d agree but given some decent ground he certainly has the pace to win the arkle, whether he has the resolution is a different matter.
January 26, 2007 at 13:12 #36419Is there any reason wny Lennon won’t handle Cheltenham? I backed him 2 weeks ago and then read on a less esteemed forum that he won’t handle Cheltenham and will get bullied in the early stages:o
January 26, 2007 at 13:26 #36420My concern with Lennon is that he’ll get taken on up front in the Arkle for the first time over fences and that once you scratch the surface of his form, it doesn’t actually stand up to a great deal of scrutiny. He beat a regressive Triumph Hurdle winner, a non-tryer and trees in a schooling exercise. I’m not convinced he’s good enough to win an Arkle.
January 26, 2007 at 13:28 #36421Quote: from davidjohnson on 1:26 pm on Jan. 26, 2007[br]My concern with Lennon is that he’ll get taken on up front in the Arkle for the first time over fences and that once you scratch the surface of his form, it doesn’t actually stand up to a great deal of scrutiny. He beat a regressive Triumph Hurdle winner, a non-tryer and trees in a schooling exercise. I’m not convinced he’s good enough to win an Arkle.
May as well go and shoot myself now then! :(
January 26, 2007 at 13:49 #36422FSL
On the positive side, I think he’ll handle the track.:biggrin:
January 26, 2007 at 14:08 #36423One thing about the Arkle market is that as impressive as Fair Along has been, he has been recieving a 4-y-o allowance in those races. Will he still get it an allowance now he’s 5? If not, that difference might be something negative to consider.
This is certainly not the exciting clash that was being promised last season, even if that, in effect, it did not materialise.
January 26, 2007 at 14:16 #36424He still gets an allowance AP.. Both cheltenham novice chase winners last year had the allowance as well.
Grassy, I’m not saying no otehr horse has but just that he probably has the requisite pace. Whether he has the will like DJ says is a different matter.. But at 50’s it’s a bit of interest
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.