Home › Forums › Big Races – Discussion › 2000 guineas 2015
- This topic has 243 replies, 32 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 5 months ago by Triptych.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 24, 2015 at 15:33 #866612
I forgot to say that Joseph O Brien has mentioned that Gleneagles reminds him of Giant’s Causeway.
There is no 4/1 left now on Gleneagles, best price is now 7/2.
Thanks for the good crack. Time for me to move on. Be lucky.
March 24, 2015 at 17:39 #866920The only straw I can clutch at with Gleneagles is that he hasn’t won over 8f and hasn’t ran at Newmarket.And also thst, perhaps Aidans horses, having long seasons ahead of them might not be fully wound up for the race.
March 24, 2015 at 21:33 #866964It’s a pity the 2000 guineas is run barely a month into the season when a number of the field haven’t made their 3yo debuts. Just makes it all the harder to pick the winner. Here’s hoping its a zafonic moment for young Joseph and not a long shot none but the lucky few picked.
March 24, 2015 at 21:54 #866967When I first started logging and looking at the trends it was always Sadler’s Wells but of course that particular gene has been bred into the Galileo line so it would appear that the key genes are passed down from the stallion to their sons and the likes of Coolmore and Godolphin spend big money on buying up their protogee knowing there is a strong chance the genes will have been passed down and run their race campaigns accordingly. The old saying the cream always rises to the top is true in most Group 1 races. I agree with the Mr Prospector for good to firm and this is usually the type of ground come early May that can be found in Newmarket. So I guess its how the horse is likely to take to the ground and the battle uphill in the final furlong if they are up for the battle. Or is it as I suspect its the jockeys that are on board that make a big difference and in particular their top riding weight, with the best jockeys riding for the top stables and owners that really tip the balance and are likely or not to be riding the best horses.
Question are all the horses carrying the same weight for the race ? therein I believe you have part of the solution, I think you will be surprised from what I uncovered in my racing analysis many years ago and again more recently as well. The bookies know this from very early on and price accordingly and this is where I believe a lot of the people in the forum are very astute in their ante-post analysis which is usually very good and I enjoy reading.
March 24, 2015 at 23:15 #867015The only straw I can clutch at with Gleneagles is that he hasn’t won over 8f and hasn’t ran at Newmarket.And also thst, perhaps Aidans horses, having long seasons ahead of them might not be fully wound up for the race.
I think he’ll be fine at the trip Moe. He’s far from being a trailblazer and he has usually tracked other horses in his races to date, keeping on pretty well when taking it up.
The two potential areas you could identify as an achilles heel, if he has one, are the ability to handle soft ground and the slight tendency to wander when coming to the front.
His only defeat came on his first start, which was on yielding ground. It may be that he was a bit backward and needed the run but his next three starts were on good to firm, before running on good ground in France. He might well go on the soft but we don’t know 100% and that may also exacerbate the other area of doubt that may exist.
Gleneagles hasn’t actually gone and blown a field away thus far. He has tended to track the pace then come through to take it up and stay on well enough to hold them at bay without going right away. When he beat Vert De Grece in the Group 2 Futurity, he took it up a furlong and a half out but drifted a bit and his lead was cut down to a 3/4 L margin at the winning line. In France he finished first past the post, a half length ahead of Full Mast but, as we know, his waywardness led to him being demoted to third place. It just makes you wonder if he’ll be a horse who doesn’t want to be in front for too long.
Perhaps he will have left those tendencies behind with maturity, but if he is a horse who needs to be produced at the right time, it just raises a few of questions if the ground is softer, if they race in different groups etc, as we saw how last year’s split seemed to affect the race.
The best horse probably, some will say certainly, didn’t win the race last year, and you’d feel a lot more cosy sitting with 10/1 Gleneagles than be contemplating joining the Glee Club at 7/2.
Thanks for the good crack. Time for me to move on. Be lucky.
March 24, 2015 at 23:30 #867016I think the Coolmore factor might be blinding you all !!
My thoughts are leaning toward Godolphin or part Godolphin horses.
If it comes up soft Belardo would have to be considered.
Charming Thought has beaten Ivawood and yet its twice the price !!
Richard Pankhurst could be a massive improver and has done nothing wrong either (impressive at Ascot) and beat Toscanini further than Gleneagles did. If Mr Gosden can get this fit and ready come May 2nd then it could be very interesting indeed.March 25, 2015 at 08:20 #867082I was at Haydock in July when debutant Faydhan blew the opposition away. Reading the RFO yesterday it seems Charlie Hills was a bit shocked that his colt Dutch Connection was beaten and names Faydhan as the horse he’d most like to train.
March 25, 2015 at 09:32 #867102I think Estidkhaar is a bit of a forgotten horse for the Guineas. If you can excuse his Dewhirst run, though surely he would be more closer to the 8/1 mark.
The Dewhrust run was disappointing, maybe the horse had gone over the top for the season. It was also run on the softest ground the horse had encountered. I backed Belardo that day as clear this horse wants cut in the ground and will be a serious contender if we have a soft ground Guineas.
But I think a decent ground Guineas , I can see Estidkhaar being bang there and I think the 20/1 available is overpriced.
March 25, 2015 at 10:37 #867132I was looking at Belardo but he is quite a late foal [1st April]and that’s a stat that puts me off him. Which is annoying cause he ticks a lot of the other boxes.
March 25, 2015 at 11:25 #867137I can’t get any info on French horses but does anyone know if Full Mast is very much a sprint bred horse?
March 25, 2015 at 11:54 #867142seetehsun
pretty sure i read somewhere,that Estidhkaar sustained a hairline fracture of the hock,in the race
March 25, 2015 at 12:22 #867148Thanks for that Walton. I was not aware of the injury, you have increased my confidence a little, if that was the case.
March 25, 2015 at 13:17 #867161I can’t get any info on French horses but does anyone know if Full Mast is very much a sprint bred horse?
Moe, Full Mast is by Mizzen Mast out of Yashmak.
Mizzen Mast was also trained by Ms Head-Maarek and was runner up in the Grand Prix de Paris over 10f, having won at 9.5f.
I am not a pedigree man but one of his best offspring has been Flotilla, who won the French 1000 Guineas in 2013.
Yashmak is a horse I know more about, because I backed her at 40/1 for the Oaks before she ever set foot on a racecourse. Owned by Khalid Abdullah and trained by Henry Cecil, she, unsurprisingly to my eyes, wasn’t involved in the 1000 Guineas but ran better at Epsom, finishing 4th to stable companion, and 14/1 Ante_post shot for me, Reams Of Verse in The Oaks. She went on to land the Ribblesdale at Royal Ascot in terrific style by nine lengths, before finishing runner up when 6/4f in The Irish Oaks, beaten by John Oxx’s Ebadilya, whom I had actually also punted each-way at Epsom, despite having a very strong position with 14/1 and 40/1 on the two Cecil Fillies.
As I say I am not a pedigree expert and I tend to judge on racing style and visual impression. Full Mast has been keen and/or made the running in his three races thus far. I feel he might need to settle better at Newmarket if he does travel over. As ever, the question is whether these French trained horses will stay at home for their own version of the Guineas. I wouldn’t back him for Newmarket myself.
Thanks for the good crack. Time for me to move on. Be lucky.
March 25, 2015 at 13:40 #867169Thanks steve; I’m always afeared of the French horses and it’s frustrating not being able to read up on them [computer says no]. I always look for the words ‘quickened’ in their previous races descriptions.
March 25, 2015 at 17:26 #867286Aiden O’Brien has indicated that John F Kennedy will stay in Ireland early season and take in the Ballysax and Derrinstown trials en route to Epsom.
That as good as rules him out of the 2000 Guineas but he was always doubtful for that race anyway in my opinion, as both he and Sir Isaac Newton always seemed more likely to be Derby contenders.
Money keeps trickling on Gleneagles and the 7/2 is drying up. I would imagine 3/1 will be the best price by the weekend.
Richard Hannon’s Estidhkaar seems to be failing to attract support so far and it all seems to be about Ivawood from that stable.
Somewhat bizarrely, Godolphin’s Charming Thought is shown as a positive mover into 16/1 but the reality seems more that those who were going 25/1 on him have removed him from their lists. Only five firms are quoting him now and he’s 94 on Betfair. Looks like a move to be very wary about as it looks a bit of a false indicator that his odds have shortened.
Thanks for the good crack. Time for me to move on. Be lucky.
March 25, 2015 at 19:33 #867303Charming Thought out til at least Royal Ascot Steve.
Never mind just get on Richard Pankhurst!!March 25, 2015 at 20:32 #867327Charming Thought out til at least Royal Ascot Steve.
Never mind just get on Richard Pankhurst!!I had been assuming all was not well with Charming Thought.
It is a pet hate of mine when these odds guides show a horse as blue, suggesting it has been backed, when in fact it just happens that the people quoting the higher odds have removed the horse from their betting. Of course, people should be aware of what they are backing but I thought these sites were meant to help punters get the best value and you can’t get value on a horse that won’t be running.
I was against the horse after his shock Middle Park win from Ivawood purely because of Godolphin’s own trainers poor early season form in particular and a general malaise all of last season, I also had doubts about him at a mile and it is interesting that connections mention both The St James’ Palace and the new Group 1 sprint as potential Royal Ascot targets.
To me a 20lb rise for his defeat of Ivawood on soft ground looked a tad fanciful but, as always, the proof will be in how he runs when he’s considered back to form.
I like the look of Richard Pankhurst myself. I was very impressed by the progress he made from his first to second run last season and Godolphin have wisely, a la Dawn Approach, left him with the original trainer.
Thanks for the good crack. Time for me to move on. Be lucky.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.