The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

sporting sam

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 17 posts - 16,474 through 16,490 (of 16,505 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: SP returns again #28531
    Avatar photosporting sam
    Participant
    • Total Posts 16597

    Surely what suits the bookies is the new SP. <br>

    in reply to: Monday 5th February #70115
    Avatar photosporting sam
    Participant
    • Total Posts 16597

    Nice winner Moolarman!!!<br>25/1 get in there.:cheesy:

    in reply to: Agnes Haddock #27946
    Avatar photosporting sam
    Participant
    • Total Posts 16597

    Quote: from stevedvg on 4:15 pm on Feb. 3, 2007[br]Eh?

    Good luck to her, but what the ****<br>’s she doing on a racing program?

    Is she contributing to the analysis of the races?

    I don’t think so.

    Has our culture really stooped to the level where we give a large amount of airtime to someone that got lucky with their pinsticking?

    What’s next?

    Will this week’s lottery winner be given a seat on Question Time next Thursday night and be asked how we can solve the problems of the country?

    Steve<br>

    <br>Well done to the Lady. I didnt see the morning line, but I`m sure Agnes would have brightened up a very dull show.<br>She landed the scoop six bonus race and tipped up a 25/1 runner up. <br>She`s picked five of the six winners the previous week herself before her last selection was replaced by the favourite which duly won.<br>So Steve she`s picked more winners than anyone else on the show put together.  <br>What right have they got to be on the show?!!!!<br>As Channel four screen and promote the scoop there would be a real interest and it would be silly not to include this winner on the show. <br>Well done Agnes Haddock.

    (Edited by sporting sam at 2:20 pm on Feb. 5, 2007)

    in reply to: Agnes Haddock #37610
    Avatar photosporting sam
    Participant
    • Total Posts 16597

    Quote: from stevedvg on 4:15 pm on Feb. 3, 2007[br]Eh?

    Good luck to her, but what the ****<br>’s she doing on a racing program?

    Is she contributing to the analysis of the races?

    I don’t think so.

    Has our culture really stooped to the level where we give a large amount of airtime to someone that got lucky with their pinsticking?

    What’s next?

    Will this week’s lottery winner be given a seat on Question Time next Thursday night and be asked how we can solve the problems of the country?

    Steve<br>

    <br>Well done to the Lady. I didnt see the morning line, but I`m sure Agnes would have brightened up a very dull show.<br>She landed the scoop six bonus race and tipped up a 25/1 runner up. <br>She`s picked five of the six winners the previous week herself before her last selection was replaced by the favourite which duly won.<br>So Steve she`s picked more winners than anyone else on the show put together.  <br>What right have they got to be on the show?!!!!<br>As Channel four screen and promote the scoop there would be a real interest and it would be silly not to include this winner on the show. <br>Well done Agnes Haddock.

    (Edited by sporting sam at 2:20 pm on Feb. 5, 2007)

    in reply to: Wednesday 31st January #70028
    Avatar photosporting sam
    Participant
    • Total Posts 16597

    4.10 Leicester<br>Hardybuck<br>likeble Jockey on board in amatuers race<br>loads of runners so its a tiny win bet.

    (Edited by sporting sam at 4:08 pm on Jan. 31, 2007)<br>2nd @ 6/1

    (Edited by sporting sam at 10:32 am on Feb. 1, 2007)

    in reply to: Racing Post #27540
    Avatar photosporting sam
    Participant
    • Total Posts 16597

    I am aware that Bruce Millington is the Sports Editor.<br>Lincoln some of these tipsters have been taken to court, high court, on a regular basis because of the extraordinary nature of their claims. These tipsters charge huge fees, thousands. Among their claims they often say "all selections proofed to the Racing Post". to give credibility to their claims. So where then is this proofing? At the same time the Racing Post  rakes in many many thousands in advertising fees.  I`m pleased to say I dont subscribe to tipsters, but many others have been duped into parting with their hard earned. So this is basically dishonest right?<br>Hardly worth it? <br>They cost punters millions and rake in similar amounts for the RP so why the hike. <br>Oh, and I forgot to mention the 7/7 emergency edition and the keep Our Kieran in Racing Campaign. <br>

    in reply to: Racing Post #37204
    Avatar photosporting sam
    Participant
    • Total Posts 16597

    I am aware that Bruce Millington is the Sports Editor.<br>Lincoln some of these tipsters have been taken to court, high court, on a regular basis because of the extraordinary nature of their claims. These tipsters charge huge fees, thousands. Among their claims they often say "all selections proofed to the Racing Post". to give credibility to their claims. So where then is this proofing? At the same time the Racing Post  rakes in many many thousands in advertising fees.  I`m pleased to say I dont subscribe to tipsters, but many others have been duped into parting with their hard earned. So this is basically dishonest right?<br>Hardly worth it? <br>They cost punters millions and rake in similar amounts for the RP so why the hike. <br>Oh, and I forgot to mention the 7/7 emergency edition and the keep Our Kieran in Racing Campaign. <br>

    in reply to: Racing Post #27537
    Avatar photosporting sam
    Participant
    • Total Posts 16597

    Quote: from Mounty on 6:17 pm on Jan. 30, 2007[br]I have a vested interest as I work for said rag but what difference does ten pence make? Would you stop going to your local pub if the beer went up from £2.80 to £3.00? I’d probably have a moan, within earshot of the landlord, then shout "same again please!". <br>

    <br>Please dont take offence Mounty.<br>To be honest, I`d change Pubs. There is a huge variation between prices of pints in different pubs. <br>The Racing Post has a monopoly and has exploited that Monopoly for me once too often So its saturdays and the odd weekday for me. <br>To be fair I have been getting very bored of the RP over the last few years for the rubbish tipsters adverts<br>such as Brimardon, Thommo etc which the  Racing Post allows and never ever proofs and is  happy to keep taking money for , Alistair Down`s retrospective Drivel,  and the ever so smug Bruce Millington (He`s the Editor?)<br>The data is what I want and while its available i`ll get it off the website. <br>If you get made Redundant you`ll know why. <br>Because when your customers said they didnt like your price you told them to like it or lump it.

    <br>

    in reply to: Racing Post #37201
    Avatar photosporting sam
    Participant
    • Total Posts 16597

    Quote: from Mounty on 6:17 pm on Jan. 30, 2007[br]I have a vested interest as I work for said rag but what difference does ten pence make? Would you stop going to your local pub if the beer went up from £2.80 to £3.00? I’d probably have a moan, within earshot of the landlord, then shout "same again please!". <br>

    <br>Please dont take offence Mounty.<br>To be honest, I`d change Pubs. There is a huge variation between prices of pints in different pubs. <br>The Racing Post has a monopoly and has exploited that Monopoly for me once too often So its saturdays and the odd weekday for me. <br>To be fair I have been getting very bored of the RP over the last few years for the rubbish tipsters adverts<br>such as Brimardon, Thommo etc which the  Racing Post allows and never ever proofs and is  happy to keep taking money for , Alistair Down`s retrospective Drivel,  and the ever so smug Bruce Millington (He`s the Editor?)<br>The data is what I want and while its available i`ll get it off the website. <br>If you get made Redundant you`ll know why. <br>Because when your customers said they didnt like your price you told them to like it or lump it.

    <br>

    in reply to: Good Name, Good Name  (for a horse) #27720
    Avatar photosporting sam
    Participant
    • Total Posts 16597

    Having been Pulled up under the 18 characters rule,<br>P-P-P Will have to be known as PulledupPulledupPU.:cheesy:

    in reply to: Good Name, Good Name  (for a horse) #27718
    Avatar photosporting sam
    Participant
    • Total Posts 16597

    Buy a promising chaser from abroad change its name to <br>PulledupPulledupPulledup and send it to Jonjo O`Neil.<br>Call it PPP for short.

    in reply to: Racing Post #27532
    Avatar photosporting sam
    Participant
    • Total Posts 16597

    e·vince  (-vns)<br>tr.v. e·vinced, e·vinc·ing, e·vinc·es <br>To show or demonstrate clearly; manifest: evince distaste by grimacing.<br> <br>I grimaced and gurned when I saw the price and gave the aforementioned  paper back to the counter Maid and declared "once, twice, thrice they haith raised the price no more, no more!!" I said.<br>Ok no I didnt say that, but you get the picture.<br>The lady in the paper shop always used to call it the financial times because of the price.  

    Its not as if its in a price war with anyone is it?

    in reply to: Racing Post #37196
    Avatar photosporting sam
    Participant
    • Total Posts 16597

    e·vince  (-vns)<br>tr.v. e·vinced, e·vinc·ing, e·vinc·es <br>To show or demonstrate clearly; manifest: evince distaste by grimacing.<br> <br>I grimaced and gurned when I saw the price and gave the aforementioned  paper back to the counter Maid and declared "once, twice, thrice they haith raised the price no more, no more!!" I said.<br>Ok no I didnt say that, but you get the picture.<br>The lady in the paper shop always used to call it the financial times because of the price.  

    Its not as if its in a price war with anyone is it?

    in reply to: Racing Post #27528
    Avatar photosporting sam
    Participant
    • Total Posts 16597

    Can’t wait to see the threads when they start charging for the website.

    Maybe so dj,<br>I have been a daily user of the post in the past, I have kicked it into touch because of the price hike. <br>True, they have a monopoly, but they are not making  a profit from me anymore.<br>

    in reply to: Racing Post #37192
    Avatar photosporting sam
    Participant
    • Total Posts 16597

    Can’t wait to see the threads when they start charging for the website.

    Maybe so dj,<br>I have been a daily user of the post in the past, I have kicked it into touch because of the price hike. <br>True, they have a monopoly, but they are not making  a profit from me anymore.<br>

    in reply to: Racing Post #27523
    Avatar photosporting sam
    Participant
    • Total Posts 16597

    It may only have been a 10p rise, but for me it was the straw that broke the camels back.  <br>£1.20- £1.30- £1.40 – £1.50 in a not a great deal of time.<br>There are only two days a week when I buy it now.<br>Getting used to using the website rather than flicking through the pages. <br>I`m not missing it at all.  <br>

    in reply to: Racing Post #37187
    Avatar photosporting sam
    Participant
    • Total Posts 16597

    It may only have been a 10p rise, but for me it was the straw that broke the camels back.  <br>£1.20- £1.30- £1.40 – £1.50 in a not a great deal of time.<br>There are only two days a week when I buy it now.<br>Getting used to using the website rather than flicking through the pages. <br>I`m not missing it at all.  <br>

Viewing 17 posts - 16,474 through 16,490 (of 16,505 total)