- This topic has 39 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by
.
- Posts
- Total Posts 55
Based on the limited results to date a pattern appears to be emerging with those rated in the 30’s winning, in the 20’s making the frame, less than this out with the washing!!
Ironic that my top SF won the Chief Red Cloud race!!
No horse fits the bill at either Lingfield or Kempton tomorrow but I will continue to post any subsequent horses that meet the new criteria.
- Total Posts 55
Remembering my earlier comments that this form of rating for me is in its infancy and no doubt will need refining as I collate more data.
My figures point to Flirty 7.20 Wolverhampton currently around 50-1!!
This may have been mentioned to you before, actuary, I don’t really mind where you put your selections but there is a section on this site, I believe it’s called "lays and plays" where your selections will be delightfully received.
Colin
- Total Posts 55
This may have been mentioned to you before, actuary, I don’t really mind where you put your selections but there is a section on this site, I believe it’s called "lays and plays" where your selections will be delightfully received.
Thanks Seabird. Not a problem. Almost everywhere I post on the forum someone tells me I should be posting elsewhere. Rather than have this hastle it would easier not to post here so this will be my last.
- Total Posts 17716
Actuary
Aren’t you being just a little bit precious about all this?
You have put up selections in the general horse racing section, and Seabrird has offered friendly advice they are in the wrong section; you put up a general horse racing query in the systems section, and I advised you that you would get better response in the appropriate section, so isn’t your chagrin more the result of your abjectly failing to live up to your initiallly claimed 32% strike rate, rather than responsible members offering you perfectly reasonable suggestions?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.