The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

the best not rated the best

Home Forums Tipping and Research Trends, Research And Notebooks the best not rated the best

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #3096
    newyork
    Member
    • Total Posts 215

    talking about ratings,can anyone figure why the likes of zilzal ,warning ,mark of esteem ,dubia millenium even zafonic were rated higher than the great miesque

    #78635
    Prufrock
    Participant
    • Total Posts 2081

    By "rated higher" I imagine you mean the respective horses’ master ratings. A master rating is a reflection of a handicapper’s view of the best one-off form a horse showed, not a measure of its consistency or durability. Those two are better measured by individual performance ratings.

    Using such a method you would probably find that Miesque was rated higher than most if not all of the horses you mention.

    #78636
    newyork
    Member
    • Total Posts 215

    i meant form the international classifactions ratings

    #78637
    Prufrock
    Participant
    • Total Posts 2081

    Those are master ratings: that is my point.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.