The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

Smart analysis isolation

Home Forums Tipping and Research Trends, Research And Notebooks Smart analysis isolation

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 141 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1487308
    Dynamite21Dynamite21
    Participant
    • Total Posts 111

    “DO YOU KNOW …

    * How to tell when they’re trying?
    * How to spot a stiff?
    * How to read the trainer’s mind?
    * How to tell when they’re not betting?
    * How to pick the “mudders”?
    * How to tell which races to pass?
    * How to throw out sure-fire losers?
    * How to bet different kinds of races?
    * How to beat any race that’s fit to play?”

    i have been looking through my horse racing books and the proceeding opening gambit is from an Americian book circa 1960. It’s full of yankee phrases and definitely shoots from the hip. The sort of articles that wouldn’t get printed in the Racing Post, for fear of killing the GOLDEN GOOSE.

    My idea is to digest the individual chapters and boil them down to the bare bones and see how useful they are. Given the potent fact that this book is isolated away from the influences from Bookmakers, Betfair and any industry self interest.

    i invite feedback, conversation and discussion.

    Gareth B-)

    “the art is in the mystery”

    #1487317
    adminadmin
    Keymaster
    • Total Posts 726

    look forward to seeing what comes out of your study on it Gareth

    #1487368
    gamble
    Participant
    • Total Posts 2731

    Back again to the sixties eh ? Of course there are many more “horseheads” out there and people that live for the buzz of the track – and understandable really they had 200 year march on us and its in their blood. You pay 2.50 3.50 for a ‘program but this is a document of science containing about a hundred pieces of the jigsaw including length behind and positional fractionals amongst the plethora of stats and so unlike English courses who treat the public much like mugs who they think want a knees up as they flutter away their three pony bank. The U.S. encourage Phd’s.

    I have only been investigating the American way for six months but the markets are getting stronger as more tune in by default. Of the New York courses I have a particular fondness for Aqueduct as I have had some incredible turn ups there. As for spotting a stiff – that could be a horse player after the last get out of trouble stakes outsider is a cigar away from a good night’s sleep. Alternatively it could be a course with an uphill enough to sap a frontrunner out of a show. Win place and show is the order. Good luck dynamite but if you can re-light the fuse and crack the code from way back then it will be akin to a moon landing but have fun in your tin can – I for one will be watching and possibly Neil.

    flatcapgamble…I love Lucy :rose:

    #1487418
    Dynamite21Dynamite21
    Participant
    • Total Posts 111

    Thanks Keymaster for your encouragement. :good:

    gamble i think we must have the same psychologist. A lot of your message definitely chimes with me. Yeah i regard every race as a 100 piece jigsaw that must be divided amongst the runners (min of 1 piece each). Again i consider the prospect of making longterm worthwhile money from betting to be akin to putting a MAN ON THE MOON. Moreover it’s clearly not sufficent to know how to do it
    (THATS HARD ENOUGH) but you then have to perform the task.

    Another thought of mine is… Bookmakers don’t wake up each morning scratching their heads saying “how do i make money today?” They have a system and they stick to it ridgidly. Winning punters must execute an equal amount of professional systematic discipline. So harping back to the 1960’s isn’t a problem to me the wisdom of the ages still rings true, (well lets see). Also American books on horse racing give the subject a far more forensicly serious approach that is lacking with GB offerings.

    It’s a shame that USA racing is very dull, and therefore holds no interest for me.
    My only focus is on UK horse racing i just want to extract some yankee insight.

    Dynamite21 B-)

    #1487420
    Dynamite21Dynamite21
    Participant
    • Total Posts 111

    pre-amble2

    #1487421
    Dynamite21Dynamite21
    Participant
    • Total Posts 111

    contents14

    #1487423
    gamble
    Participant
    • Total Posts 2731

    Well dynamite you have a lot of energy for the cloth ears in this house that are stuck in old Blighty waiting for their non-existent season to suddenly drum up when Sam the bugler is calling them from Belmont. There is very little free data – even basic – so to take it seriously you need to donate a few dollars more to Equibase Brisnet or Time form U.S. or others.

    Betfair is engrossed with its sports book. I must be near to 3000 races I have rated in the past six months and a lot of U.S. stuff but the last three months I have been much more selective. I had three bets only at Tampa last night and went heavy laying the odds on favourite in the last mistakenly initially at 2.38 but had some more below 2.( betfair odds)
    I don’t often find Stonkas like that. I have just finished Toowoomba. Tampa was hard last night especially the initial five or six races – that’s why I was writing in here.

    Horseracing still has some secret avenues but edges do go in time – unless you have a rare one that’s far from the maddening crowd. The little greenies might help but hope you don’t bump into them Clangers up there.

    flatcapgamble….Blow my bloody door off ! :unsure:

    #1487425
    Nathan HughesNathan Hughes
    Participant
    • Total Posts 22016

    Interesting thread dynamite
    :good:

    Member since March 2008
    #1487426
    gamble
    Participant
    • Total Posts 2731

    Good to hear from Newton Abbot

    flatcapgamble…He’s from Cidershere :yahoo:

    #1487427
    GingertipsterGingertipster
    Participant
    • Total Posts 26588

    I guess the answer to all your questions, Dynamite are a collective, “yes”.

    Or if not yes to all/every race, then the answer is – if you can’t work out who’s “trying” then don’t bet in those races. Bet in races where everyone tries. However, most horses are trying, they just do not have conditions to suit and/or out of form/trainer is out of form. Therefore can not run to their best rating. That said, the lower the grade the more skulduggery goes on, so if concerned then don’t bet in lower grades.

    “Stiff” courses are interesting to know and usually favour those with stamina. However, position according to the individual pace of the race is key. ie Stiff finishes favour hold up horses only if the pace is good/strong from a fair way out. Slow fractions actually favour prominent runners big-time! Imagine a jockey being told (seemingly wisely) “keep something for the stiff uphill finish” and yet if every jockey does just that then it is even more difficult for hold up horses to win. ie To catch the leaders who are themselves quickening. Therefore – even more important than usual – need to know how much pace is in the race. What the pace is likely to be and where each jockey/horse is likely to sit in the field.

    Reading the trainer’s mind. Connections will try and do what’s best for the horse in order to win this or a race. However, some trainers are in better form than others (best judged more on how their recent runners performed above or below market expectation rather than purely number of winners). Some trainers are better at winning races after lay-offs… And just to complicate things some horses are better fresh/first time after a break too… Some need a run or two in order to peak. Some trainers will have a better record at particular courses and some horses are better at certain courses/types of course (right/left handed, undulating/flat, stiff or easy etc. Some trainers do better at certain times of the year, ditto for some horses. Look up Aurora’s Encore’s Spring form compared to Winter and ask yourself whether he should ever have been 66/1 (119/1) for the 2013 Grand National. ;-)

    If unable to deduce from the above… Some trainers/owners don’t bet, some do. For those that do, it is sometimes best to wait and see which way the market goes. ie If a horse itself ran poorly last time out for no apparent form reason… it will (only partly) be allowed for in the original market. A further lengthening can be expected if not thought to be in A1 condition. However, if beginning to shorten might be best to get on before it shortens to a price the horse would’ve been in the first place without the poor run last time out.

    How to pick the “mudders” on turf (beware, it won’t be the same way in American Dirt racing)! Best to look at the form, but if no previous soft/heavy runs then look at the horse’s action. A rounded pounding action is usually what’s required, where as a pointed toe and/or daisy cutting is a top-of-the-ground/firm ground action. If not knowing its action then the sire, dam’s and to a degree grand-sires effectiveness on the surface can tell quite a bit.

    Hope that answers some questions Dynamite.
    …More to come.

    value is everything
    #1487432
    GingertipsterGingertipster
    Participant
    • Total Posts 26588

    How to tell which races to pass? Fairly simple – types of race the individual bettor has a poor record with. But also races which are difficult to work out where the pace is going to come from (although could bet in=running). Also don’t bet if the race is too difficult to work out (for any reason) the fair chances of all horses in the field. Be aware that each horse’s chance/fair odds affects all the other horses fair odds/chances.

    There is no such thing as a “sure-fire loser” (or winner). Standing in the Goodwood grandstand, a racing pal of mine Chris asked “what do you think of horse X the paper 11/2 second favourite. I said “rain hasn’t come in his favour, disappointed on good-soft and this is even softer”. I walked around to see them in the paddock. On the way back I looked at the tote board. This particular horse was now 16/1 and at those odds worth a small wager! Needless to say I backed it and Chris did not. Soft ground form can be a coincidence.
    If a horse lacking in stamina for a 12f race it still has a chance of winning if the early and mid pace are both slow. Not needing to stay 12f to win a 12f race.
    Outsider might be 100/1 and has a poor chance of winning, but you only need to believe it has a 2% chance to be worth a bet at those odds! Every horse has its price.

    Personally, I look at every race the same way. Value Is Everything.
    Books concentrating on finding “winners” often don’t work. Profit is about more than winners alone.
    Many will know their form book inside out, but unfortunately if a punter is no good at converting form in to chance he/she will fail.

    Long term success depends on strike rate compared to average odds of his/her winners. Profit can then be improved by betting more when believing the odds particularly generous compared to what you believe the fair chance/odds are.

    value is everything
    #1487480
    Dynamite21Dynamite21
    Participant
    • Total Posts 111

    gamble i don’t like USA horse racing i just want to distill the knowledge from the book in question. Therefore i have no need for Americian data (PHEW!) Happily i maintain my own database and have accesss to 20 years of UK results data.

    Thanks Gingertipster for your very detailed reply :mail: i am sure i will refer back to it many times in the near future, as i continue with the main thrust of this exploratory THREAD conversation.

    My nature is not to rush to answers/decisions i enjoy reflecting and considering ideas and angles of thought. Ultimately i hope to be able to work towards developing a filter through which a race’s vibe/mood music around the solid form can be detected.

    A database QUERY simulation would be… :yahoo:

    #1487481
    Dynamite21Dynamite21
    Participant
    • Total Posts 111

    *(no comments in the margins right now, :scratch:
    ASK THE AUDIENCE TIME …what do you think of this First Chapter?)

    ch1-1-crop1

    #1487482
    Dynamite21Dynamite21
    Participant
    • Total Posts 111

    ch1-2-crop1

    #1487483
    Dynamite21Dynamite21
    Participant
    • Total Posts 111

    ch1-3-crop1

    D21 B-)

    “risk estimation rules!”

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 141 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.