Home › Forums › Archive Topics › Systems › (Rating*100)/£Prize money = Stake
- This topic has 139 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 7 months ago by Hatter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 26, 2011 at 13:00 #17352
13:05 Musselburgh Silverlord £12.82
13:15 Huntingdon Spanish Treasure £10.12
13:35 Musselburgh Aneyeforaneye £11.51
14:35 Musselburgh Dica £15.08January 26, 2011 at 17:36 #337763Results Wednesday 26 Jan 2011
13:05 Musselburgh Silverlord £12.82 WON 2.54 BSP +£18.76
13:15 Huntingdon Spanish Treasure £10.12 LOST 3.75 BSP
13:35 Musselburgh Aneyeforaneye £11.51 WON 3.95 BSP +£32.27
14:35 Musselburgh Dica £15.08 LOST 21.33 BSPRunning total: +£25.83
January 26, 2011 at 19:12 #33778750% strike rate, now that can’t be bad
discretedata
can it.
Well done.
Billy's Outback Shack
January 27, 2011 at 04:07 #337861Thursday 27 January 2011
14:25 Ffos Las Alla Svelta £10.41
January 28, 2011 at 04:29 #337993Result Thursday 27 January 2011
14:25 Ffos Las Alla Svelta £10.41 LOST 6.6 BSPRunning total: +£15.42
Selections Friday 28 January 2011
12:50 Doncaster Semi Colon £10.94
13:30 Fontwell Raya Star £11.00
13:55 Doncaster Andhaar £11.57
15:50 Fontwell Manshoor £10.05January 28, 2011 at 09:50 #338004Testing to see if able to display a table
[table]
[tr]
[th]Meeting[/th]
[th]Time[/th]
[th]Selection[/th]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Ascot[/td]
[td]14:30[/td]
[td]Green God[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Newmarket[/td]
[td]14:45[/td]
[td]Raffingora[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]January 28, 2011 at 09:53 #338005and again
<table border="1" bordercolor="FFCC00" style="background-color:FFFFCC" width="400" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="3">
<tr>
<td>Table Cell</td>
<td>Table Cell</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Table Cell</td>
<td>Table Cell</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p style="font-family:verdana,arial,sans-serif;font-size:10px;"><a href="http://www.quackit.com/html/html_table_tutorial.cfm" target="_top">HTML Tables</a></p>January 29, 2011 at 05:19 #338127No winners yesterday.
Running total: -£28.14
No selections today
I’ve been using a couple of filters as an experiment namely
Race Class <=4 and Stake =>£10.00
and that is why there are no qualifiers today.
January 30, 2011 at 07:55 #338305Selections for Sunday 30 January 2011
13:35 Hereford Cucumber Run £12.31
15:35 Hereford Mannlichen £10.12January 30, 2011 at 18:25 #338403Results for Sunday 30 January 2011
13:35 Hereford Cucumber Run WON 1.95 BSP
15:35 Hereford Mannlichen WON 3.95 BSPRunning total: +£11.32
Need to give some thought to the staking.
January 30, 2011 at 21:34 #338424Looking v promising, discretedata but I’m not sure I understand the rationale behind the method…perhaps you could elaborate.
Powered by Linux
January 31, 2011 at 06:49 #338444elcartero
I started a similar thread last year……
http://www.theracingforum.co.uk/horse-racing-forum/systems/horseracebase-system-t83664.html
The rationale, and I use the term loosely, was that using the HRB ratings at that time, I sought to identify horses of the same or a similar rating and then rank them. The theory being that, Horse A, a 200 rated horse would have a better chance of success in a £2000 race than Horse B a 200 rated horse in a £50,000 race.
I simply multiplied the rating by 100 and divided that figure by the race value. Using the example above this is how the figures would look:-
Horse A (200*100) divided by £2000 = £10.00
Horse B (200*100) divided by £50000 = £0.40It seemed a good idea at the time to use those resultant figures (the £10.00 and £0.40 in the above example) as a guide to the amount to be staked on each selection. I simply posted daily, a maximum of four top-rated rated selections I think it was, that carried the highest stakes.
I had to pull the plug on that thread but this one carries on in a similar vein albeit with a couple of filters for race class and the amount to be staked.
Because of the filters there are no selections today (Monday 31 January 2011).
January 31, 2011 at 12:33 #338483Many thanks, disc…..makes good sense to me now.
I like the class filter and wonder whether you have checked out the viability of a field size filter.
Incidentally, I subscribed to HRB as a result of reading some of your earlier posts and I’m very impressed with their base ratings…I get the impression that you are no longer using them so I wonder what ratings you are using now?
I fully accept that if you tell me. you may have to kill me!Powered by Linux
January 31, 2011 at 13:46 #338495elcartero
No, I must admit I haven’t checked out the possibilty of adding a field size filter however it’s something that I’ll have a look at now you’ve mentioned it.
I’m pleased you’re pleased (!) with HRB and the good thing is that it can only get better provided members continue to give feedback as to what features they’d like to see incorporated in to the System Builder and the other sections of the site.
As you’ll probably have gathered from the above comments I’m still using HRB.
You may be interested to know that I use the HRB ‘My Daily Report’ utility to produce the qualifiers by ticking the boxes for
Prize Money
,
Race Class
, and
Total Rating
. Finally from the drop-down list bottom left of screen, I click on
Use UK Races Only
.
The resultant report, downloaded in to an Open Office Calc spreadsheet, provides the raw data required to produce the selections posted on this thread.
February 1, 2011 at 04:16 #338567Selections for Tuesday 1st February 2011
14:10 Folkestone Sire De Grugy £11.67
15:10 Folkestone Knighton Combe £11.33
16:10 Folkestone The Bishops Baby £10.21February 1, 2011 at 19:18 #338698Results for Tuesday 1st February 2011
14:10 Folkestone Sire De Grugy £11.67 WON 1.26
15:10 Folkestone Knighton Combe £11.33 LOST
16:10 Folkestone The Bishops Baby £10.21 WON 4.90Running total: +£40.69
February 1, 2011 at 21:24 #338725Results for Tuesday 1st February 2011
14:10 Folkestone Sire De Grugy £11.67 WON 1.26
15:10 Folkestone Knighton Combe £11.33 LOST
16:10 Folkestone The Bishops Baby £10.21 WON 4.90Running total: +£40.69
Looking good
Powered by Linux
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.