Home › Forums › Archive Topics › Trends, Research And Notebooks › Racemares theory.
- This topic has 25 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by
Gerald.
- AuthorPosts
- February 26, 2009 at 21:25 #212479
2002
Tashawak
3111
17/
First two wins were the previous season, but did follow it up at 5/2 Gp2 Falmouth Stakes. Then tried Gp 1 . .2006
Red Evie !
911111
115177120/
Well, she was already on a run. Followed it up at 15/8 and 6/1Okay, that was a very small sample.
I think that before 2002 it was called the Fern Hill Stakes, so I’ll do a search for that now.February 26, 2009 at 21:41 #212482Soviet Song
111424523121116312416252/
February 26, 2009 at 21:43 #2124831988
Storm Kitty
2811
80/
Beat1989
Minstrel Guest
065111
0424/
Beat1992
Calpella
4411
080/
Beat
Calpella wasn’t the real winner – beaten 0.5 lengths by Nashville Blues, won race in Stewards’ Room. I was on Nashville Blues.1993
Barboukh
6472211
567/
Beat1996
Dawna
2211
40/
Beat1997
Brave Kris
723811
640620147/
Beat1999
Holly Blue
456011
6422000/
Beat2000
Papabile
522411
148/
Followed up at 100/302001
Independence
372411
311/
BeatFebruary 26, 2009 at 21:47 #212485I think it’s a good idea to look for graded-level horses who can dominate a niché type of race. Over the last few years, look at horses like Beef or Salmon (3m chases in Ireland), Nickname (2m/2m4f chases in Ireland) and lately Catch Me (2m-3m hurdles in Ireland – they were/are a class above the rest in their respective, weak divisions and can build-up sequences. This obviously applies to mares too, i.e., Solerina, Peeping Fawn on the flat.
There’s also the factor for mares of being in-foal though this applies to older handicappers who, once they win and confirm that it has had an effect (it doesn’t always) can then run-up quick sequences because being in-foal has made them 20/30 pounds better.
February 26, 2009 at 21:50 #212487Okay, here is a challenge. Branston Abby ran 97 times. Can anyone come up with a mare that ran more than 100 times?
February 26, 2009 at 22:18 #212492Too easy!
Madame Jones.
February 26, 2009 at 23:11 #212502Can anyone come up with a mare that ran more than 100 times?
Does Merlene Ottey count?
gc
Jeremy Grayson. Son of immigrant. Adoptive father of two. Metadata librarian. Freelance point-to-point / horse racing writer, analyst and commentator wonk. Loves music, buses, cats, the BBC Micro, ale. Advocate of CBT, PACE and therapeutic parenting. Aspergers.
February 27, 2009 at 05:23 #212554Therefore, the theory is inconclusive, I gather?
I don’t feel defeated regarding the "suggestion" – I still believe mares are more likely to string consecutive wins together within the niche market of mares races, owing to the nature and attitude of a mare.
I must say, reading my own suggestion and reasoning – it sounds absolutely ludicrous and without merit, but I can’t dismiss the argument!
I probably need a lie down.
February 28, 2009 at 00:10 #212662What I want to investigate is something analogous.
We have all come to know through Big Mac that backing 3yos versus older horses in the early part of the season is folly.
However, if a 3yo DOES win against older oppo early on, is it worth following?
I’ll check out out the results for 2007 & 2008 ( the only ones I have), and post them on Sunday, as there is no overtime.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.