Home › Forums › Horse Racing › Little things in racing that annoy or irritate you.
- This topic has 29 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 8 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 16, 2010 at 22:06 #283057
People who can’t grasp that horses are not robots and whine through their pockets when something doesn’t work out for them. Stick to virtual racing.
And second the drunk thing; that’s one of the reasons I’ve not been to the Festival in years.
March 16, 2010 at 22:20 #283063Five live chit chat during the race ,does my nut.
March 17, 2010 at 07:45 #283169Racing programmes that waste too much time focusing on the spectators- Royal Ascot is of course most guilty of this- I detest the fashion pieces taking time away from looking at the horses in the pre-parade ring. But Channel 4 keep taking in the folk kicking about the stands too!
March 17, 2010 at 09:05 #283187Second, Third , Fourth Colours etc of owners that are indistinguishable from each other.
In last year’s King George we were told to look out for markings on the horses’ noses to tell the main two protagonists apart! Yesterday, we had a terrestrial race at the Cheltenham festival where not even the commentator, who’d probably swotted up for hours, could tell you if the jolly had made a mistake or a nigh identically garbed horse.
Do racing folk not understand the concept of the away kit? The idea is that it’s a completely different colour to make it easily distinguishable.
March 17, 2010 at 09:32 #283193Racecourses judges, some bust a gut to announce the result without calling a photo and others like the clown at Cheltenham yesterday think it’s good fun to have dramatic pause before announcing the result. Both have got it wrong in my view and one of the newer judges, Di Clark does the job how it should be done imo.
It seems like judges and starters are just allowed to do what they want by the BHA, a judge last year had Cattermole and some women in his box before he had announced the result
March 17, 2010 at 10:30 #283206Yeats stated…..a judge last year had Cattermole and some women in his box before he had announced the result
AC/DC? Everyone to their own thing, I say. Whatever turns you on.
March 17, 2010 at 13:31 #283258They still persist with that annoying Paddy Power advert and the grinning baboon!!
March 17, 2010 at 22:53 #283461The phasing out of traditional race titles.
For example, the ‘Grade 1 joebloggsbookies.com Novice Chase’ (registered as the Pendil Novices Chase) etc. Why the ‘Grade 1 joebloggsbookies.com Pendil Novices Chase’ couldn’t work is beyond me.
And the complete removal of a long standing race title to make some tosser of a sponsor happy. Such as tomorrow’s STAYER’S Hurdle.
World Hurdle?
March 17, 2010 at 23:39 #283485Ugly sponsor logos on fences. It’s okay if it’s a horse feed or the name of a racetrack or something, but garish colors and ads for things like car insurance remind me of NASCAR.
March 18, 2010 at 20:41 #283743Five live chit chat during the race ,does my nut.
Seconded.
Add me to the Lee McKenzie "not so keen" camp.Gets far too excited for my liking.
Disagree. It’s a pity he’s not doing the Radio 5 racecalling anymore, a class or several above the garrulous old women (Cornelia, Joan and Lucy) that make the R5 commentaries so cringeworthy these days.
March 18, 2010 at 22:48 #283775Second, Third , Fourth Colours etc of owners that are indistinguishable from each other.
In last year’s King George we were told to look out for markings on the horses’ noses to tell the main two protagonists apart! Yesterday, we had a terrestrial race at the Cheltenham festival where not even the commentator, who’d probably swotted up for hours, could tell you if the jolly had made a mistake or a nigh identically garbed horse.
Do racing folk not understand the concept of the away kit? The idea is that it’s a completely different colour to make it easily distinguishable.
It would be handy to take on the french coloured sash idea.
March 18, 2010 at 22:56 #283777AnonymousInactive- Total Posts 17716
No full body shot pictures of horses in their profile on the Racing Post.
March 18, 2010 at 23:04 #283780AnonymousInactive- Total Posts 17716
No full body shot pictures of horses in their profile on the Racing Post.
Contrariwise, I thought it was pretty silly of Racing UK to show slow-mo close-ups of all the
jockeys’ faces
before the World Hurdle. It would have made more sense to show us the horses, or failing that a more backward part of the riders. A jockey’s facial features are not the most recognisable part of his or her anatomy during a race.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.