Home › Forums › Horse Racing › In Today’s Racing Pages
- This topic has 243 replies, 32 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 4 months ago by
Venusian.
- AuthorPosts
- January 3, 2006 at 22:05 #2383
‘Favourite’ performance is a pointer to the future of betting
Greg Wood<br>Tuesday January 3, 2006
<br>http://sport.guardian.co.uk/horseracing/comment/0,10148,1676770,00.html
January 3, 2006 at 23:10 #68087Far be it from me to crib an article that appeals to punters to ‘annoy their bookmaker no end’ but doesn’t the fav usually outperform most tipsters? Is this a new phenomenon?
January 4, 2006 at 17:12 #68088I thought it was a good piece…
The problem with these tipping contests is that they are obliged to pick something every day. And only one…
Far more effective would be say, pick 8 a month or something. And why not 5 on one day for instance?
In a way the traditional restriction almost makes a loss inevitable and must give the impression to some punters that that is all there is to the game
January 6, 2006 at 13:10 #68090Full profile of trainer Venetia Williams by Andrew Baker in today’s Telegraph:
January 8, 2006 at 11:32 #68092A mildly humourous report on yesterday’s action (albeit lacking in subtlety!) here by Brough Scott on "Balls and Bureaucracy" in today’s Sun Telegraph.
January 10, 2006 at 12:58 #68093Stalls handlers farrago looks a disaster in the making
Greg Wood <br>Tuesday January 10, 2006<br>The Guardian
http://sport.guardian.co.uk/horseracing … 99,00.html
<br>
January 10, 2006 at 13:34 #68094Zilzal,<br>totally agree…if something is not sorted out soon they will be gettin unskilled peolple who are given a bit of training and in my opinion there are going to be accidents waiting to happen…
January 10, 2006 at 18:46 #68095It amazes me how the racing world is prepared to risk their costly immature two year olds to inexperienced handlers whether this is in a training yard or on a race track.<br>Presumably, insurance covers accidents but what about psychological damage? How many potentially great horse are ruined by harsh handling?
January 13, 2006 at 13:04 #68096"Bookmakers pull the strings on British racing’s puppet."
<br>Julian Muscat in the Times Today:
January 17, 2006 at 13:01 #68097Club poised to make new race-fix charges
Leaks put Flat jockeys and bookmaker in frame; Scotney team have two investigations under way
Greg Wood<br>Tuesday January 17, 2006<br>The Guardian
January 17, 2006 at 18:59 #68098It looks like Alan Lee will be winning even more friends in the Jockeys’ room after his piece in today’s Times.
While I have every admiration for the courage of Jump Jockeys, Lee is foolish and wrong to suggest that the Jockeys should be easily forgiven and more leniently punished for the Crosse & Loughran style howlers.
It is simply too easy for an unscrupulous jockey to deliberately simulate such a blunder for financial gain and bring the sport into disrepute. As racing finds it impossible to prove such wrongdoing, all  such spectacular blunders must be harshly and exemplarily punished.
<br>http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,379-1988735,00.html<br>http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,379-1988735,00.html
January 17, 2006 at 19:26 #68099A bit unfair, Zilzal, to harshly punish a jockey for the serious blunder of misjudging the finishing post. We had a job seeing the one at Sandown, hidden in front of a sea of bookies’ umbrellas.<br>On the flat, some jocks can deliberately start slowly, or get behind a wall of horses, or feign riding out. How do you punish that?
January 17, 2006 at 19:46 #68100Nor1 , If there is not serious deterrent such mistakes will become even more commonplace.
You are right about the non-triers who like to start slowly and get lost in the crowd. I think there should be a maximum limit in fields; the Irish races involving 20 to 30 runners are ridiculous and an invitation to non-triers.  In my view there is even an argument for forbidding jockeys the luxury of  looking over their shoulders !!
January 19, 2006 at 13:44 #68101Decision nears on Fallon fix charge
Paul Kelso<br>Thursday January 19, 2006<br>The Guardian
January 19, 2006 at 16:47 #68102Great news. Let’s hope the racing industry can clean up their sport. It may even deter some people if they thought they could get caught.<br>However, I still think the handicap system needs sorting.
January 23, 2006 at 19:20 #68103IMHO the Tote should grow its business by reducing its deductions to near betting exchange levels and then hand over the proceeds  to fund prizemoney. Prizemoney of  around £500 for 3rd and 4th is a joke.
Health scare can’t keep Jones on sidelines
In his first interview since collapsing in Japan, the Tote chairman faces up to a critical year for his firm
Greg Wood<br>Monday January 23, 2006<br>The Guardian
January 26, 2006 at 18:58 #68104Viewing figures boost for upbeat Racing UK
"A total of 85% of Racing UK’s subscribers decided to renew their contract at the end of 12 months"
Greg Wood<br>Thursday January 26, 2006<br>The Guardian
http://sport.guardian.co.uk/horseracing … 07,00.html
Following piece posted already is worth holding in this thread…
Here’s how to kick sand in the bookmaker’s face
There’s no getting away from all-weather racing in winter – here’s what you need to help make it pay
Chris Cook<br>Wednesday January 25, 2006<br>The Guardian <br>http://sport.guardian.co.uk/horseracing/story/0,,1694008,00.html<br>
(Edited by zilzal at 7:36 pm on Jan. 26, 2006)
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.