- This topic has 76 replies, 36 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by
.
- Posts
Apologies Paul. I mistakenly thought The Rabble had come to their senses on this loophole from what you originally wrote. Now things are much clearer.
As long as it’s not a two horse race or all opponents aren’t backed then it’s okay.
So as long as Findlay leaves out the 1000 rag he’s not really laying by proxy if he chose to back every other horse in the race bar his? Maybe Fergus Wilson’s runners do serve a purpose after all………as a loophole for bent connections.
Apologies Paul. I mistakenly thought The Rabble had come to their senses on this loophole from what you originally wrote. Now things are much clearer.
As long as it’s not a two horse race or all opponents aren’t backed then it’s okay.
So as long as Findlay leaves out the 1000 rag he’s not really laying by proxy if he chose to back every other horse in the race bar his? Maybe Fergus Wilson’s runners do serve a purpose after all………as a loophole for bent connections.
All of which is exactly why I believe it should be clarified.
Back in a week.
Judith
Two more owners charged with laying their own horse…
Cav,
Assuming your link is correct, this is an old case that was dealt with back in May. The owners in question were both disqualified for 12 months.
AP
Thanks, AP. The BHA put this up on their website today, must have been a mistake on their part.
They seem to have corrected it now. Both cases involve Irish connections, maybe thats where the confusion arose.
- Total Posts 17716
I just wrote a long post Carv which I have now scrapped.
Absloutely blatant stopping job. What happened to the jockey?
- Total Posts 17716
Casela Park?…….not guilty surely?
Sounds a bit like the time when Alan Jarvis said he overheard Scotney at a party saying he was going to get Fallon but Scotney denied it under oath so it can’t be true.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.