AP,
I understand your point and can see both sides of the Countryside Day arguement. I guess it’ll come down to the view of the racecourse’s own boards which may be split on the issue.
I was in charge of the PR for Whitbread’s racing sponsorship and was integral to their decisions on cancelling both the Murphy’s meeting and the Whitbread Gold Cup meeting.
You are absolutely correct about their worries pertaining to age group – specificially with regard to the viewing audience of Channel 4 racing which was contracted to show Cheltenham and Sandown.
However their cancellation had nothing to do with countryside day at the Murphy’s meeting. In fact they wre happy for the Countryside Alliance to use the Whitbread marquee on Friday to host their own lunch and fund raising auction for only a minimal donation.
The cancellation was more down to new brand managers coming in who wanted to be "trendy" and try to appeal to a younger audience – hence "Sisters of Murphys" etc. They did not feel happy with the incumbent portfolio of sports they were taking on, such a racing, when they wanted to get more into youth orientated sports.
It is interesting to note that both the Stella Artois tennis tournament and the Heineken Rugby survived – although their brand managers were not so aggressive in their "need to modernise".