- This topic has 25 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 1 month ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Mtoto – you’re not actually VDW yourself are you? Just wondered as you do seem to have the old Dutchman on the brain!
,my own thoughts on vdw,s ratings the little owl , race ect is that the secound column is some kind of handicap rating or procedure little owl secound column rating 90 first column rating 69 i,m covinced this means little owl ran 21 days ago no way to check, maybe secound column is projected handicap running ran 85 lto dropped 5lbs projected rating 90
formath in vdw,s assesment of saher,s lincoln he says
from the top of the handicap the five most consistant. not first 5 or 6 in the betting would he use this in sprints where most winners would be found at the top of the handicap
no more questions from me for now its all getting a bit strange over on the other board seen this happen before on an other site dont mind learning through my pocket for a few weeks thanks again formath
Mtoto44
No need for apologies as I can see from my writings in the past I could appear to be a VDW enthusiast. I have only ever posted my opinion about VDW on boards/sites where I thought it would be of interest to others.
class tells
I don’t know the answer to your query about sprints. VDW stated that consistency coupled with the first 5/6 in the betting forecast was, “but one of many ways to narrow the field and at the same time put the odds in your favour.” So that quote about the Saher race was just another way he gave.
As an illustration here is an extract from Sports Forum, April 17th 1980:
“Consider the two races on the card having the highest prize money. If the favourite is at reasonable odds (actual market) and the field not too large select the first five in the betting.
From these sort out the three that have been off the course for the shortest time.
Call the three horses A, B and C and split them into two bets (A being the first quote) AB and BC. Stake two points A one point B for the first bet and one point each for the second BC. Each of the two bets are kept separate and applied to a simple staking method. If A or C wins that particular series wins. If B wins both succeed.”
“I have outlined just the bare bones of the method leaving readers to use a little initiative. Those who studied my previous contributions will appreciate it is just another way to reduce the field.”If you want any other VDW information please send me a private message and I will do my best to help. I would be quite happy to scan the Sports Forum cuttings that I have and send them for you to study and form your own opinion. For example I believe I have a copy of the staking plan he used for the above method.
have had a wee look at the cambridgeshire the first filter was must have been first or secound within last two runs left 17 then the 8 with the least days since ran of these the 3 most consistant are mutajarred,docof the bay ,monte alto,also went down class rating till i had two who were consistant pipedreamer 240 and monte alto 232 7th and 8th best
good god almighty how stupid do i feel
the little owl vdw ratings ,on and off have looked at these ratings for a while to see if i could work them out on a earlier post it was hinted as to what they were based now the penny has dropped now know how to work out the secound column god stupid wee things can make your day 
using the little owl type ratings with rpr the three horses to take out of the cambridgeshire are ,the illies,monte alto,docof thebay is this correct formath
good god almighty how stupid do i feel
the little owl vdw ratings ,on and off have looked at these ratings for a while to see if i could work them out on a earlier post it was hinted as to what they were based now the penny has dropped now know how to work out the secound column god stupid wee things can make your day Would you care to elaborate, CT?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.