The home of intelligent horse racing discussion
The home of intelligent horse racing discussion

Compiling your own standard times

Home Forums Archive Topics Trends, Research And Notebooks Compiling your own standard times

Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 53 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #14009
    Avatar photoMDeering
    Member
    • Total Posts 1688

    What is the process behind developing standard times for various distances across various racecourses?

    Is it as simple as noting down all the times recorded for the selected distance, adjusting them for going and class, averaging them out and voila?

    Any other ideas?

    Thanks in advance.

    #274063
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Total Posts 17716

    Buy a stopwatch ? :? crazy way to try and find winnersIMO

    What I do through, after being advised to, is look back the results of the day and compare time for time on that day only………what is good to soft exactly?……damn sure it isn’t the same on a Monday as it is on a Tuesday. So judging horses by time can be a mile off.

    If you use the above method it pretty much gives you an idea what the pace of the race is but you will get grade 1 hurdles being run slower than Novice hurdles at time so using it as a beting guide is near on usless most of the time.

    Look at the past year on the flat. Some amazing times put up by horses that got stuffed next time they ran…..a few even broke track records……..not my cup of tea.

    #274065
    Avatar photoThe Ante-Post King
    Participant
    • Total Posts 8695

    Look at the past year on the flat. Some amazing times put up by horses that got stuffed next time they ran…..a few even broke track records……..not my cup of tea.

    Lemmings and Cliffs come to mind! :lol:

    #274067
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Total Posts 17716

    LOLOLOLOLOL :)

    #274080
    apracing
    Participant
    • Total Posts 3764

    Mike,

    Go to Google Books, enter Mordin On Time in the search box, then scroll down to page 17, and you can read his answer to your question.

    AP

    #274088
    Avatar photoaaronizneez
    Participant
    • Total Posts 1751

    Buy a stopwatch ? :? crazy way to try and find winnersIMO

    What I do through, after being advised to, is look back the results of the day and compare time for time on that day only………what is good to soft exactly?……damn sure it isn’t the same on a Monday as it is on a Tuesday. So judging horses by time can be a mile off.

    If you use the above method it pretty much gives you an idea what the pace of the race is but you will get grade 1 hurdles being run slower than Novice hurdles at time so using it as a beting guide is near on usless most of the time.

    Look at the past year on the flat. Some amazing times put up by horses that got stuffed next time they ran…..a few even broke track records……..not my cup of tea.

    Fist

    Times can be of use on the AW though as generally the going remains the same. Pace of the race is obviously important but AW races tend to be run at a decent pace so you can get a good idea of which horses can cover the distance in the least amount of time. It can help narrow the field down particularly in a field of AW handicap regulars. :wink:

    #274103
    Avatar photoMDeering
    Member
    • Total Posts 1688

    Mike,

    Go to Google Books, enter Mordin On Time in the search box, then scroll down to page 17, and you can read his answer to your question.

    AP

    Of course, Nick Mordin is the answer …

    Thank you AP.

    #274106
    apracing
    Participant
    • Total Posts 3764

    Mike,

    Well he provides one answer – I’m not convinced that it’s THE answer ……

    Wouldn’t THE answer result in every horse earning a speed figure of 42 ……

    AP

    #274113
    Prufrock
    Participant
    • Total Posts 2081

    Do not use means or medians. Times are distributed abnormally, due to its being easier to run slow than fast, and any methodology needs to take that into account.

    #274115
    Avatar photoPompete
    Member
    • Total Posts 2390

    Wouldn’t THE answer result in every horse earning a speed figure of 42 ……AP

    And the form would read: 0101010

    #274116
    Avatar photorobnorth
    Participant
    • Total Posts 7521

    Mike,

    Well he provides one answer – I’m not convinced that it’s THE answer ……

    Wouldn’t THE answer result in every horse earning a speed figure of 42 ……

    AP

    Yes, and we know that turned out to be wrong!

    Rob

    #274124
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Total Posts 17716

    Time is the only method to judge a horses true potential, when we are looking at comparing different decades rather than go on form lines our only solid evidence is time.

    Time is pathetic you say?, well why can’t Our Kes win the Eclipse, why can’t Perlachy win the July Cup? if it was so irrelevent.

    Track Records on RP and other sites are well out, the distances are wrong and new strips of ground have been put down at a few tracks.

    Rather than knock it, actually put some time and consideration into it, you’ll find you will be better off than lookin at form lines.

    #274126
    Avatar photoCav
    Participant
    • Total Posts 4833

    Using Mordin On Time will give you a glorified class rating more than a pure speed figure.

    I don’t like the way he adjusts times to calculate median times. His class pars are spot on.

    #274128
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Total Posts 17716

    Using Mordin On Time will give you a glorified class rating more than a pure speed figure.

    I don’t like the way he adjusts times to calculate median times. His class pars are spot on.

    I also think he’s guilty of trying to speed up horses

    #274222
    Avatar photoanthonycutt
    Member
    • Total Posts 980

    Just to say, the ‘standard times’ with RacingPost are a load of old honk.

    Their ‘standard time’ for 1m2f for example is a full nine seconds faster than the course record over that distance!

    #274354
    Prufrock
    Participant
    • Total Posts 2081

    Not sure which course you are referring to there, and RP’s own published methodology shows there are flaws in how they go about compiling standard times and timefigures, but it is of course possible for a standard time to be faster than a course record.

    Standard times are meant to apply across different tracks as well as distances, so they should be less likely to be achieved on poor courses than good ones due to the abilities of the horses likely to be concerned.

    #274362
    Avatar photoanthonycutt
    Member
    • Total Posts 980

    Not sure which course you are referring to there, and RP’s own published methodology shows there are flaws in how they go about compiling standard times and timefigures, but it is of course possible for a standard time to be faster than a course record.

    Standard times are meant to apply across different tracks as well as distances, so they should be less likely to be achieved on poor courses than good ones due to the abilities of the horses likely to be concerned.

    I was refering to Haydock. Do the standard times apply to all races over that distance over all courses?

    I didn’t know that, I thought it was just the standard time for that particular course.

Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 53 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.