- This topic has 45 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 11 months ago by
.
- Posts
1)2:45 Newbury – DENMAN at 1.21 = 1st
2)9:20 Wolverhampton – BASALT at 1.76 = 1stRunning profit loss = – 0.97 points
1)2:45 Newbury – DENMAN at 1.21 = 1st
2)9:20 Wolverhampton – BASALT at 1.76 = 1st
3) 3:50 Plumpton – SERHAAPHIM at 1.88 = 1stRunning Profit/LOss = – 1.85 points
1)2:45 Newbury – DENMAN at 1.21 = 1st
2)9:20 Wolverhampton – BASALT at 1.76 = 1st
3) 3:50 Plumpton – SERHAAPHIM at 1.88 = 1st
4) 1:30 Folkestone – AUX LE BAHNN at 1.96 = 2ndRunning Profit/LOss = – 0.85 points
Well done to get that one beaten. I find it slightly unusual that you aren’t using level stakes, but whatever works for you I guess!
The lays are to level stakes. They are all layed to win 1 point.
Thanks Zoso. I worked that out from your figures. That’s not level stakes though. You are risking different amounts on each horse and are varying this directly according to the price they are trading at, rather than your own assessment of how strongly you feel they might be beaten.
I know exactly what I am doing but thanks for the advice. I am looking to win 1 point from each bet by laying horses that I believe are underpriced. As they are all odds on shots the maximum risk is 1 point from any lay (counting 2.0 as odds on although 2.0 is neither odds on nor odds against). The risk from each bet is always 1 point or lower, generally speaking it will be between 1/2point and 1 point risk although every once in a blue moon a horse trading at 1.21 will come along that I want to take a stand against.
The 10 lays will finish in profit, I told everyone that before I started them, I am still telling them that after the first 3 lays won. People on here are quick to assume that I dont understand or that I am wrong, however these people will be proved to be wrong, talk is cheap and my actions will speak louder than any of the small minded peoples words.1)2:45 Newbury – DENMAN at 1.21 = 1st
2)9:20 Wolverhampton – BASALT at 1.76 = 1st
3) 3:50 Plumpton – SERHAAPHIM at 1.88 = 1st
4) 1:30 Folkestone – AUX LE BAHNN at 1.96 = 2nd
5) 3:50 Musselburgh – HALLA SAN @ 1.88 = 1stRunning Profit/Loss = -1.73 points
A somewhat embarrasing run of results that reflects my current form. Still a measly 1.73 points in negative and I still make myself a heavy odds on shot to finish the 10 lays in profit.
1)2:45 Newbury – DENMAN at 1.21 = 1st
2)9:20 Wolverhampton – BASALT at 1.76 = 1st
3) 3:50 Plumpton – SERHAAPHIM at 1.88 = 1st
4) 1:30 Folkestone – AUX LE BAHNN at 1.96 = 2nd
5) 3:50 Musselburgh – HALLA SAN @ 1.88 = 1stRunning Profit/Loss = -1.73 points
6) 6:50 Kempton – DANETIME LORD @ 2.0
1)2:45 Newbury – DENMAN at 1.21 = 1st
2)9:20 Wolverhampton – BASALT at 1.76 = 1st
3) 3:50 Plumpton – SERHAAPHIM at 1.88 = 1st
4) 1:30 Folkestone – AUX LE BAHNN at 1.96 = 2nd
5) 3:50 Musselburgh – HALLA SAN @ 1.88 = 1st
6) 6:50 Kempton – DANETIME LORD @ 2.0 = 2ndRunning Profit/Loss = -0.73 points
Zoso,
I’m definitely not trying to tell you that you’re doing anything wrong, I was just curious and interested as to your approach. If it works for you, that’s fine. I won’t bother you any further.
NV
Dont take my answer the wrong way Non Vintage and feel free to ask any questions or offer opinions. Most of what I wrote in my post wasnt actually aimed at you.
remainder of post deleted
I have two points to make in this thread..
1. Danetime Lord was 2nd 11/10 and therefor shouldn’t count (unless I’m missing something).
2. If Triple Crown has sent messages for members to join his forum via the private messenger and this can be proven then I agree he ought to be banned.
Members in the past have been banned for similar.(this is for Cormack to decide though).That is all!
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.