- Total Posts 188
I could name the computer program used but as it is a commercial product I will not do so because of libel laws.
If fact the computer program did so poorly that I dropped it from my analysis.<br>At present I am running 4 remaining comparisons. I pick a race at random from all types of race with less than 14 runners where all the horses have at least 3 race placings.<br>I then check each race and note the following for it.<br>The Adrian Massey Top rated.<br>The Fineform Top rated.<br>My Own System Top rated<br>A specific newspaper tipster choice.
Results so far from 170 Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â£10 bets:
Adrian Massey Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â£366 loss<br>Fineform Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â£412 loss<br>My System Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â£22 loss<br>Newspaper tipster Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â£594 loss.
It is early days yet and the positions of each selection method may change.<br>What I have seen so far indicates the poor predictive ability of commercial computer programs. This surprised me to say the least. I shall continue my analysis to see if tipsters or fineform perform any better than my own system, the rules of which are writtten on two sides of A4 paper.